EGU26-13488, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-13488
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 04 May, 17:25–17:55 (CEST)
 
Room D2
From Hazard to Consequence: Impact-Based Drought Monitoring and Prediction
Amir AghaKouchak1, Phu Nguyen1, Tu Ung1, Debora de Oliveira1, Annika Hjelmstad1, Julia Massing1, Abdulmohsen Aljohani1, Charlotte Love1, Ali Mirchi2, David L Feldman1, Daniel Placht3, and Dalal Najib3
Amir AghaKouchak et al.
  • 1University of California, Irvine, CA, USA (amir.a@uci.edu)
  • 2Oklahoma State University, OK, USA
  • 3National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, USA

Growth in satellite observations and modeling capabilities has transformed drought monitoring by enabling near real-time situational awareness. Yet many operational efforts still emphasize hazards rather than impacts, and they often miss the compound and cascading risks that frequently accompany drought, including heatwaves, wildfires, floods, and debris flows. In this presentation, we first introduce a real-time drought monitoring and seasonal prediction system that integrates diverse data streams with AI-based algorithms for drought forecasting (https://drought.eng.uci.edu/). We then describe how drought information can be expanded beyond hazard metrics by incorporating impact and vulnerability data to support impact-based assessment of extremes and decision-relevant risk insights (https://water.eng.uci.edu/).  Using several examples, we argue for an impact-centered drought monitoring paradigm that links hydroclimate conditions to physical and societal outcomes, such as crop yield losses, food insecurity, energy production disruptions, and labor impacts. We also highlight key challenges that must be addressed to make this approach operational, including inconsistent and incomplete drought impact records, limited Information about local water management and human interventions (e.g., demand, intra- and inter-basin transfers, pumping, and withdrawals), and persistent gaps between impact models and existing drought monitoring workflows. Finally, we discuss anthropogenic drought as a framing concept and show how impact-based drought analysis can be strengthened by representing drought as a coupled climate–human phenomenon rather than a purely climatic hazard. 

How to cite: AghaKouchak, A., Nguyen, P., Ung, T., de Oliveira, D., Hjelmstad, A., Massing, J., Aljohani, A., Love, C., Mirchi, A., Feldman, D. L., Placht, D., and Najib, D.: From Hazard to Consequence: Impact-Based Drought Monitoring and Prediction, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-13488, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-13488, 2026.