- 1University of Salento, DiSTeBA, Lecce, Italy (piero.lionello@unisalento.it)
- 2Department of Climate Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management, Deltares, Delft 2629~HV, The Netherlands
- 3Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584~CB, The Netherlands
- 4Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4~7TJ, UK
- 5Institute of Geosciences and Earth Resources - CNR-IGG, National Research Council, Padova 35127, Italy
- 6The Mediterranean Institute of Biodiversity and Marine and 21 22 Continental Ecology IMBE -- UMR CNRS 7263 / IRD 237 / Aix Marseille Universit\'e / Avignon Universit\'e, Marseille 13397, France
- 7Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2~9JT, UK
- 8Department of Economics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venezia 30121, Italy
- 9Department of Adaptation and Social Learning Global Climate Forum e.V. (GCF), Berlin 10178, Germany
- 10Coastal Risks and Climate Change Unit, Risks Department, BRGM – French Geological Survey, Orleans 45000, France
- 11Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Mestre (Venice) 30172, Italy
- 13Institute of Geography, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Kiel 24106, Germany
- 14Institute of Marine Sciences - ISMAR, National Research Council - CNR, Venezia 30122, Italy
- 15School of Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17~1BJ, United Kingdom
- 16Adapt@Ve Programme, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei - FEEM, Venezia 30124, Italy
- 17Klaipeda University - KU, Institute of Marine Research - JTU, Klaipeda 92294, Lithuania
Venice and its lagoon form a tightly coupled coastal socio-ecological system in which urban fabric, cultural heritage, lagoon ecosystems and regional infrastructures jointly determine vulnerability and resilience to sea-level rise. As relative sea level continues to increase due to climate change and subsidence, adaptation in Venice cannot be limited to incremental risk reduction but requires transitions between fundamentally different strategies.
This contribution applies an adaptation pathways perspective to the Venice–lagoon system to examine how the available solution space decreases under rising sea level. Four adaptation strategies are considered: an open-lagoon configuration based on mobile barriers and accommodation measures, ring-diking that isolates the historic city and other settlements from the lagoon, (closed-lagoon configuration with permanent coastal barriers), and retreat through relocation or abandonment. The analysis focuses on how physical constraints, ecological impacts, social acceptability and long lead times interact to shape transitions between these strategies as sea level rise continues.
The Venice case illustrates how climate and geo-processes, infrastructures, available technical solutions and cultural values condition the timing and characteristics of adaptation tipping points, beyond which strategies can no longer meet their intended goals. By explicitly linking alternative strategies to distinct socio-ecological transformations of the city and its surrounding environment, the pathways approach helps clarify trade-offs, irreversibilities and decision time windows for urban transformation under deep uncertainty.
The results highlight the importance of early, anticipatory planning for coastal cities facing long-term sea-level rise, and demonstrate how geoscience-informed adaptation pathways can support governance of transformative change in complex urban regions.
How to cite: Lionello, P., Di Fant, V., Pasquier, U., Tosi, L., Goneri, L. C., Nicholls, R. J., Cramer, W., Cremades Rodeja, R., Giupponi, C., Hinkel, J., Sfriso, A., T. Vafeidis, A., Umgiesser, G., and Haasnoot, M.: Venice and its lagoon under sea-level rise: transformative choices for a coastal socio-ecological system, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-13739, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-13739, 2026.