EGU26-13890, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-13890
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Tuesday, 05 May, 17:00–17:10 (CEST)
 
Room D3
A method to check the structural coherence of magma-poor rifted margins seismic interpretations: application to the Iberian margin
Pauline Chenin1, Nick J. Kusznir2, Mark G. Rowan3, and Gianreto Manatschal1
Pauline Chenin et al.
  • 1Université de Strasbourg, CNRS UMR 7063, Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg, STRASBOURG, France (chenin@unistra.fr)
  • 2Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • 3Rowan Consulting, Inc., Boulder CO, United States of America

During continental rifting, two main types of faults accommodate crustal extension and thinning, namely high-angle normal faults and large-offset (“low-angle”) detachment faults. Classical interpretations of Atlantic-type rifted margins assume a predominance of high-angle normal faults in the proximal margin and of extensional detachment faults in the most distal domain; however, the structural interpretation of the so-called necking domain in between remains disputed.

Identifying high-angle faults and extensional detachment faults at rifted margins is challenging because: (1) seismic reflection images may not allow interpreters to indisputably locate the top basement and/or recognize syn-tectonic sedimentary sequences; and (2) the interpretation of extensional detachment faults is often debatable due to their faint topographic and stratigraphic expressions and the common overprint of their exhumed footwall by high-angle normal faults or erosion. Yet, the accurate identification of high-angle and extensional detachment faults is crucial for understanding the stratigraphic, thermal and isostatic evolutions of rift systems, all of which are fundamental to successful predictions.

We present a methodology to interpret crustal-scale seismic reflection images of magma-poor rifted margins and test the reliability of structural interpretations via geometrical criteria. We use TGS line 140 located offshore Portugal, north of the Peniche peninsula, as a case study. 

How to cite: Chenin, P., Kusznir, N. J., Rowan, M. G., and Manatschal, G.: A method to check the structural coherence of magma-poor rifted margins seismic interpretations: application to the Iberian margin, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-13890, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-13890, 2026.