EGU26-14047, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-14047
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 04 May, 15:00–15:10 (CEST)
 
Room D1
Estimation of Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) from SPEXone on PACE using a neural network retrieval algorithm: Comparison to AERONET and ATLID/EarthCARE
Neranga Hannadige, Guangliang Fu, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Hailing Jia, Zihao Yuan, and Otto Hasekamp
Neranga Hannadige et al.
  • Space Research Organisation Netherlands, Niels Bohrweg 4, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands

Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) play a critical role in aerosol–cloud interactions (ACI).  It has been shown that the column number of aerosol particles exceeding a predetermined threshold radius (NCCN) is a suitable CCN proxy. Previously this CCN proxy has been estimated from PARASOL using Level-2 aerosol microphysical and/or optical property retrievals. With the launch of SPEXone on Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) mission, further improvements in NCCN retrievals can be achieved. In particular, retrieved refractive index can enable estimation of the volume fraction of aerosol-water, facilitating the derivation of dry aerosol size distibution and correspondingly dry CCN. In addition, retrieved aerosol layer height (ALH) can be used to estimate the boundary layer (BL) contribution of NCCN (NCCN(BL)).

We developed a deep neural network (NN) algorithm as an extension of  the Remote sensing of Trace gas and Aerosol Products (RemoTAP)-NN framework to directly retrieve dry NCCN, and NCCN(BL) from SPEXone measurements. The algorithm was trained on synthetic SPEXone measurements generated from a three-mode aerosol representation including fine mode, insoluble coarse/dust mode, and soluble coarse mode. Initial validation was performed using  independent synthetic measurements, based on the ECHAM-HAM global aerosol-climate model.

For validating NCCN from real SPEXone observations, we use collocated AERONET data, for which both dry and ambient NCCN are computed. On the log base 10 scale, the NN algorithm achieved RMSDs of 0.33 (dry) and 0.21 (ambient) over land, and 0.21 (dry) and 0.20 (ambient) over ocean. The slightly higher RMSD for dry NCCN is attributed to the cases in which the AERONET derived refractive index reaches its upper limit of 1.6. In comparison, CCN proxies derived using the classical RemoTAP algorithm exhibited RMSDs approximately 20% higher. 

Ongoing work focuses on validating the retrieved fraction of aerosols within the boundary layer using EarthCARE ATLID Level-2 observations.

How to cite: Hannadige, N., Fu, G., van Diedenhoven, B., Jia, H., Yuan, Z., and Hasekamp, O.: Estimation of Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) from SPEXone on PACE using a neural network retrieval algorithm: Comparison to AERONET and ATLID/EarthCARE, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-14047, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-14047, 2026.