- 1Atlantic International Research Centre (AIR Centre), Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal (adriana.ferreira@aircentre.org)
- 2Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto (FCUP) and Institute of Earth Sciences (ICT), Porto, Portugal (jdasilva@fc.up.pt)
- 3Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center (NERSC), Bergen, Norway (johnny.johannessen@nersc.no)
- 4Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), Matosinhos, Portugal (jmagalhaes@ciencias.ulisboa.pt)
- 5Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, United States of America (gforget@mit.edu)
- 6French National Institute for Ocean Science (IFREMER), Plouzané, France (bertrand.chapron@ifremer.fr)
- 7National Oceanography Centre (NOC), Southampton, United Kingdom (cg1@noc.ac.uk)
- 8European Space Agency - European Space Research Institute (ESA-ESRIN), Frascati, Italy (muriel.pinheiro@esa.int)
- 9Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (magda.carr@newcastle.ac.uk)
- 10University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, United States of America (maarten.buijsman@usm.edu)
- 11University of West Attica, Athens, Greece (eoikonomou@uniwa.gr)
- 12University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (mmstastna@uwaterloo.ca)
- 13University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom (j.d.shutler@exeter.ac.uk)
- 14Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), Massachusetts, United States of America (jpineda@whoi.edu)
- 15Ukrainian Center of Environmental and Water Projects (UCEWP) and Institute of Mathematical Machines and Systems Problems, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (IMMSP), Kyiv, Ukraine (kterletska@gmail.com)
- 16Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (sam.hartharn-evans@northumbria.ac.uk)
- 17National Aeronautics and Space Administration – Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA JPL), California, United States of America (benjamin.m.holt@jpl.nasa.gov)
- 18OceanDataLab, Brest, France (dr.fab@oceandatalab.com)
- *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract
Oceanic energy budgets and mixing parameterizations are largely framed around tidal forcing, reflecting the availability of long-term, global datasets for barotropic and baroclinic tides. In contrast, internal waves, particularly Internal Solitary Waves (ISWs), remain poorly represented in global energy frameworks, despite their recognized role in transferring energy across scales, driving localized mixing, and modulating stratification. This imbalance is not only conceptual but observational: the lack of consistent, global datasets has limited the integration of internal wave processes into large-scale circulation and climate-relevant ocean models.
ISWs are nonlinear internal waves that propagate over long distances in stratified oceans, linking mesoscale and large-scale forcing to small-scale turbulence. Beyond their surface expressions observable from space, ISWs involve strong internal currents and large vertical displacements of isopycnals, with implications for offshore operations, marine structures, navigation, and ocean energetics. However, their transient nature and wide spatial extent make them particularly challenging to observe systematically, resulting in fragmented and geographically biased observational records.
We present the Internal Waves Service (IWS), which provides a first step towards addressing this gap, as a global, open, service-oriented framework for the systematic detection, mapping, and archiving of ISWs from satellite Earth Observation data. The service currently exploits synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery acquired by Sentinel-1 in Wave Mode, which provides unique, globally distributed observations of ISW surface signatures. Unlike traditional studies focused on specific regions or short time periods, the IWS processes all Sentinel-1 Wave Mode acquisitions on a continuous basis, enabling consistent global mapping of ISW presence and absence.
ISW detection is performed using an AI-assisted classification framework applied to SAR vignettes, supported by expert validation and iterative model refinement. The resulting products form a persistent, standardized dataset documenting spatial patterns and temporal variability of ISW activity across ocean basins.
By consolidating previously fragmented observations into a coordinated global dataset, the IWS provides a new observational basis for assessing the role of internal waves within ocean energy pathways. This systematic mapping supports comparative analyses, facilitates model evaluation, and opens the door to more consistent integration of internal wave processes alongside tides in multiscale ocean dynamics and energy budgets. Developed as a community-driven initiative involving 24 research institutions across 12 countries, the IWS is designed to evolve towards broader sensor integration and enhanced spatial coverage, strengthening its relevance for ocean modelling and climate studies.
Adriana Santos-Ferreira – Atlantic International Research Centre João Pinelo – Atlantic International Research Centre José C. B. da Silva – CIMAR/CIIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research Johnny A. Johannessen – Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center João Gonçalves – Atlantic International Research Centre Jorge M. Magalhães – CIMAR/CIIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research Bertrand Chapron – IFREMER, Univ. Brest, CNRS, IRD Gaël Forget – Massachusetts Institute of Technology Maarten C. Buijsman – University of Southern Mississippi Edwin Goh – NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Muriel Pinheiro – European Space Agency (ESA) Christine Gommenginger – National Oceanography Centre Magda Carr – Newcastle University Benjamin Holt – Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Marek Staśtna – University of Waterloo Samuel Hartharn-Evans – Northumbria University Emmanouil Oikonomou – University of West Attica Jesús Pineda – Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Kateryna Terletska – Institute of Mathematical Machines and Systems Problems, NAS of Ukraine (IMMSP) Mihaela Hnatiuc – Maritime University of Constanta Daniel Hayes – Cyprus Marine and Maritime Institute Michael Dunphy – Fisheries and Oceans Canada Jinbo Wang – Texas A&M University, College Station Mirel Paun – Maritime University of Constanta Jamie Shutler – University of Exeter Fabrice Collard – OceanDataLab
How to cite: Santos-Ferreira, A., Pinelo, J., da Silva, J. C. B., Johannessen, J. A., Magalhaes, J. M., Forget, G., Gonçalves, J., Chapron, B., Gommenginger, C., Pinheiro, M., Carr, M., Buijsman, M., Oikonomoy, E., Stastna, M., Shutler, J., Pineda, J., Terletska, K., Hartharn-Evans, S., Holt, B., and Collard, F. and the Internal Waves Service (IWS) Consortium: Internal Waves Service: Towards Systematic Global Observation of Internal Solitary Waves, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-14433, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-14433, 2026.