Integrating Technical, Nature-Based, and Social Solutions: A Stakeholder-driven Approach to Climate Adaptation-Mitigation Synergies

As climate change impacts intensify across Europe and globally, societies are confronted with increasingly frequent and severe hazards that challenge public health, urban livability, and environmental sustainability. While adaptation measures are urgently needed to cope with current and near-term climate risks, it is becoming increasingly evident that mitigation efforts are essential to ensure a resilient and sustainable future. Too often, however, adaptation and mitigation strategies are planned and implemented in isolation, within sectoral silos, overlooking their potential interdependencies, synergies, and co-benefits. This contribution draws on the on-going experience and perspectives of the EU-funded healthRiskADAPT project, which addresses climate-related health risks by explicitly linking adaptation and mitigation pathways across multiple hazards.

The project adopts a broad and integrated perspective that combines existing technical solutions, nature-based interventions, and engagement strategies, with a strong emphasis on co-benefits for health and well-being in the face of climate hazards namely heatwaves, air pollution including wildfire emission, and pollen. Central to this framework is the use of cost–benefit and co-benefit analyses to support decision-makers in identifying, prioritizing, and implementing measures that maximize societal resilience while delivering climate resilience solutions, considering natural based solutions (e.g., greening) as well as technical solutions (e.g., smart-buildings, do-it-yourself air purifier devices, evaporative cooling, high efficiency filtering). Beyond technical assessments, the healthRiskADAPT project recognizes that increasing resilience requires engagement beyond institutional actors. Social solutions such as education, awareness-raising, and capacity building at the stakeholder level are considered essential components of effective climate strategies. The contribution therefore also explores participatory formats and stakeholder engagement approaches designed to enhance understanding of climate-related health risks and support the co-design of locally relevant policies and interventions.

By presenting the project’s methodological pathways, tools, and engagement strategies, this contribution illustrates how integrated adaptation–mitigation planning can be operationalized in practice. It highlights the value of moving beyond sector-specific solutions toward systemic approaches that acknowledge complex interdependencies between climate, environment, health, and society. Ultimately, the contribution aims to demonstrate how such integrated frameworks can support cities and regions in developing more coherent, evidence-based, and socially inclusive climate policies, strengthening resilience in the face of a changing climate.