EGU26-15234, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-15234
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PICO | Friday, 08 May, 16:15–16:17 (CEST)
 
PICO spot 5, PICO5.1
Evaluating fungal-based nature-based solutions for agricultural drainage treatment
Lipe Renato Dantas Mendes1,2, Hannah Walling1,3,4, Philip Schuler1, Lucy Crockford3, Paul Quinn2, Stephanie Terreni-brown1, Toby Parkes1, Ellie Morris5, Mark Wilkinson2, and Marc Stutter2,4
Lipe Renato Dantas Mendes et al.
  • 1Rhizocore Technologies Ltd., Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 2The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
  • 3Harper Adams University, Newport, United Kingdom
  • 4Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
  • 5Cheshire Wildlife Trust, Malpas, United Kingdom

Diffuse nutrient pollution from agricultural runoff remains a major pressure on freshwater systems, contributing to eutrophication and downstream ecosystem degradation. Nature-based solutions (NbS) that can be deployed close to source are increasingly sought as cost-effective and multifunctional alternatives to conventional treatment approaches. Mycoremediation, using fungi to transform or retain contaminants, has potential but remains largely untested for promoting nutrient concentration and load reductions in agricultural drainage waters. Through a tiered experimental framework, we evaluate fungal-based filter matrices designed to treat agricultural runoff, with a primary focus on nitrate (NO₃⁻) and phosphate (PO₄³⁻) removal. This presentation focuses on the design, comparative performance, and field evaluation of fungal-based NbS for agricultural drainage treatment.

Filters combine organic and inorganic substrates selected to promote fungal colonisation and sustained biogeochemical activity. Saprotrophic fungal strains originating from England and Scotland were isolated, genetically confirmed, and screened under laboratory conditions to assess nutrient uptake performance. Column experiments enabled the shortlisting of substrate–fungal combinations with the strongest nutrient removal potential. Selected combinations were then tested in channel-scale experiments simulating agricultural drainage conditions using water enriched with NO₃⁻ and PO₄³⁻. We quantify upstream and downstream nutrient concentrations, dissolved oxygen dynamics, and redox potential within the filter media to assess conditions conducive to denitrification and nutrient retention. In parallel, continuous water quality monitoring is being used to assess filter performance under real-world hydrological and chemical variability across multiple agricultural sites in England and Scotland.

Data collection is ongoing and results are not yet conclusive; however, the combined laboratory, mesocosm, and field datasets will provide a robust evaluation of mycoremediation filters as scalable NbS for mitigating diffuse agricultural nutrient pollution.

How to cite: Dantas Mendes, L. R., Walling, H., Schuler, P., Crockford, L., Quinn, P., Terreni-brown, S., Parkes, T., Morris, E., Wilkinson, M., and Stutter, M.: Evaluating fungal-based nature-based solutions for agricultural drainage treatment, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-15234, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-15234, 2026.