EGU26-1564, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-1564
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Friday, 08 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Friday, 08 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X4, X4.86
Managing your drone data through the data life cycle: RDA guidelines for FAIR and responsible UAV Use
Alice Fremand1, Jens Klump2, Sarah Manthorpe3, Mari Whitelaw1, France Gerard4, Wendy Garland5, Charles George4, and Thabo Semong6
Alice Fremand et al.
  • 1British Antarctic Survey, UK Polar Data Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (almand@bas.ac.uk)
  • 2CSIRO Mineral Resources, Perth, Australia
  • 3University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
  • 4UK Centre For Ecology & Hydrology, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales
  • 5Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, STFC Ruthford Appleton Laboratory, RAL Space, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales
  • 6Botswana International University of Science & Technology, Palapye, Botswana

The use of Remotely Piloted Aerial Systems (RPAS), also referenced as Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and more generally as drones, is increasingly prevalent across various scientific disciplines, enabling the collection of large volumes of data for diverse research applications. These technologies are revolutionising data collection by offering higher temporal and spatial resolutions and enabling data collection in hazardous and inaccessible areas. However, the volume of data generated and the absence of standardised workflows to document operations and data processing often complicate data sharing and publication. 

As part of the Research Data Alliance (RDA) Small Uncrewed Aircraft and Autonomous Platforms Data Working Group, we have developed guidelines on how best to improve the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability (FAIR, Wilkinson et al. 2016) of these data and processing workflows. The working group compiled use cases showcasing RPAS applications across various research disciplines, documenting best practices and identifying gaps and challenges researchers have while handling their RPAS-derived data. We paid specific attention to legal, privacy and ethical considerations. Drawing on these insights, the group has now developed guidelines and recommendations to improve RPAS data management throughout the research life cycle, from mission planning to data publication and archiving, linking to existing resources and examples from the scientific community.

How to cite: Fremand, A., Klump, J., Manthorpe, S., Whitelaw, M., Gerard, F., Garland, W., George, C., and Semong, T.: Managing your drone data through the data life cycle: RDA guidelines for FAIR and responsible UAV Use, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-1564, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-1564, 2026.