EGU26-15833, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-15833
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Tuesday, 05 May, 10:45–12:30 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 05 May, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X1, X1.132
GEOthermal SEISmic AI Platform (GEOSEIS-AI): Shear-wave Splitting Analysis Module and A Case Study of Geothermal Site in Miaoli, Taiwan
Chao-Jui Chang1, Wei-Fang Sun2, Yao-Hung Liu1, Sheng-Yan Pan1, and Hao Kuo-Chen1,2
Chao-Jui Chang et al.
  • 1Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan (raynb0421@gmail.com)
  • 2Science and Technology Research Institute for DE-Carbonization, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan

Shear-wave splitting analysis module is part of the GEOSEIS-AI platform, primarily utilized to characterize stress states and subsurface fracture distributions in geothermal sites. However, microseismic data in geothermal sites often face on inherent limitations, including low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), cycle skipping, fast/slow wave misidentification, and null measurements, all of which compromise the accuracy of automated processing.

To solve these limitations, this study optimizes the pre-processing stage by utilizing adaptive time-window selection to maximize SNR. Furthermore, an automated quality-controlling workflow was developed, based on three diagnostic metrics: (1) peak-picking determination of fast and slow waves; (2) cross-correlation (CC) coefficients; and (3) the energy variation rate between the principal S-wave component and perpendicular component. These tests facilitate the robust identification and remove low-quality seismic events.

This methodology was validated using microseismic monitoring data from the geothermal site in Miaoli, Taiwan. The results reveal two predominant fracture sets oriented NW-SE and N-S. The NW-SE orientations align with the regional focal mechanism solutions, reflecting stress states, while the N-S trends correspond to surface-mapped fault orientations. This workflow was integrated into the GEOSEIS-AI Platform—alongside AI catalogs, focal mechanisms, and seismic tomography—to establish a reliable microseismic monitoring system for geothermal exploration.

Keywords: GEOSEIS-AI; Geothermal Energy; Microseismic Monitoring; Shear-Wave Splitting; fracture distribution.

How to cite: Chang, C.-J., Sun, W.-F., Liu, Y.-H., Pan, S.-Y., and Kuo-Chen, H.: GEOthermal SEISmic AI Platform (GEOSEIS-AI): Shear-wave Splitting Analysis Module and A Case Study of Geothermal Site in Miaoli, Taiwan, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-15833, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-15833, 2026.