- 1SRON Space Research Organisation Netherlands, Leiden, The Netherlands
- 2Scripps Institution of Oceanography and Halıcıoğlu Data Science Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- 3Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- 4Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
- 5School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
- 6Atmospheric Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- 7Leipzig Institute for Meteorology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
- 8Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, EX4 4QF, Exeter, United Kingdom
- 9Modeling of Atmospheric Processes Department, Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany
- 10School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland
- 11Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Stadiou St, Platani GR26504 Patras, Greece
- 12Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark
- 13Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract
Changes in aerosols since the preindustrial era have altered the top-of-the-atmosphere radiation balance by directly scattering solar radiation and indirectly interacting with clouds, known as aerosol effective radiative forcing (ERFaer). ERFaer persistently remains one of the most uncertain components in global climate model simulations, due to the imperfect representations of aerosol and cloud properties and processes. Perturbed parameter ensembles (PPEs) are increasingly used to quantify these sources of uncertainty and to constrain models with observations.
Here, we first present a single-model PPE using the ICON-A-HAM2.3 model, designed to identify key sources of ERFaer uncertainty. This PPE comprises 383 simulations for both preindustrial and present-day conditions, in which 42 parameters related to aerosol emissions, aerosol properties and processes, cloud microphysics, convection, and turbulence are perturbed simultaneously. Gaussian process emulators are trained on model outputs to enable efficient sampling of this high-dimensional parameter space. Our analysis focuses on uncertainty quantification and attribution for aerosol and cloud properties as well as ERFaer, along with comparisons against satellite observations from SPEXone/PACE and MODIS. Our results show a global mean ERFaer of −1.10 W m⁻² (5–95 percentile: −1.54 to −0.68 W m⁻²), with the overall uncertainty dominated by aerosol-related processes, particularly aerosol emissions.
Building on this single-model framework, we further propose a Multi-Model PPE (MMPPE) initiative within the AeroCom Phase IV experiments. This multi-model approach allows us to simultaneously address structural and parametric uncertainties across models, providing a coordinated pathway toward reducing ERFaer uncertainty in current climate models. An overview of the MMPPE design and objectives will be presented.
Hailing Jia, Duncan Watson-Parris, David Neubauer, Yusuf Bhatti, Michael Schulz, Leighton Regayre, Philip Stier, Johannes Quaas, Daniel Partridge, Ardit Arifi, Anne Kubin, Athanasios Nenes, Ulas Im, Nick Schutgens, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Sylvaine Ferrachat, Ulrike Lohmann, Ina Tegen, Alice Henkes, Carl Anders Svenhag, Irfan Muhammed, and Otto Hasekamp
How to cite: Jia, H., Watson-Parris, D., Neubauer, D., Bhatti, Y., Schulz, M., Regayre, L., Stier, P., Quaas, J., Partridge, D., Arifi, A., Kubin, A., Nenes, A., Im, U., Schutgens, N., van Diedenhoven, B., Ferrachat, S., Lohmann, U., Tegen, I., Henkes, A., and Hasekamp, O. and the PPE Team: Quantifying and Constraining Aerosol Forcing Uncertainty: From Single-Model to Multi-Model Perturbed Parameter Ensembles, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-15980, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-15980, 2026.