- 1School of Earth & Environmental Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (ybchung@snu.ac.kr)
- 2Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA (khm0501s@ucla.edu)
- 3Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA (hyeonmin.kim@jpl.nasa.gov)
- 4Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Korea University, Seoul Republic of Korea (meehye@korea.ac.kr)
- 5Department of Environment and Energy, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea (mijung.song@jbnu.ac.kr)
Secondary inorganic aerosols undergo a phase transition between solid and liquid states as a function of relative humidity. Different aerosol phases affect their size, altering their optical properties, radiative effects, and heterogeneous chemical reactions. Despite its importance, however, state-of-the-art chemical transport models have not explicitly simulated aerosol phases because of their complex hysteresis with respect to relative humidity history. We use aerosol phase-state observations from the ASIA-AQ campaign to evaluate ISORROPIA thermodynamic calculations with different hysteresis pathways constrained with observed meteorological conditions from the campaign. Although we found a marginal difference in total aerosol concentrations with the different hysteresis pathways, simulated AODs differ significantly, depending on aerosol phase, suggesting their significance for aerosol radiative forcing.
How to cite: Chung, Y., Park, R. J., Kim, H., Lee, M., and Song, M.: Observed vs. simulated aerosol phase state during the ASIA-AQ campaign: its implication for climate forcing , EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-16055, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-16055, 2026.