EGU26-16594, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-16594
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 06 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X1, X1.98
Crystal chemistry of the clinochlore – chamosite solid-solution series quantified by Raman spectroscopy
Stylianos Aspiotis1,2, Günther J. Redhammer3, Stefan Peters4, and Boriana Mihailova5
Stylianos Aspiotis et al.
  • 1Hamburg University of Technology, Institute for Materials and X-ray Physics, Hamburg, Germany (stylianos.aspiotis@tuhh.de)
  • 2University of Hamburg, Centre for the Study of Manuscript Cultures (CSMC), Cluster of Excellence “Understanding Written Artefacts”
  • 3Paris-Lodron University Salzburg, Department of Chemistry and Physics of Materials
  • 4Museum der Natur Hamburg-Mineralogie, Leibniz-Institut zur Analyse des Biodiversitätswandels (LIB)
  • 5University of Hamburg, Department of Earth System Sciences

Chlorites are rock-forming layered silicates with a predominantly trioctahedral cation arrangement. The clinochlore (nominally Mg5Al(Si3Al)O10(OH)8) – chamosite (nominally Fe2+5Al(Si3Al)O10(OH)8) series are the most widespread chlorite solid solution, which occurs in diverse geological settings. These can range from sedimentary rocks and low- to medium-grade metapelites and metagreywackes in oceanic crust, to hydrothermal settings as the typical alteration products of ferromagnesian magmatic minerals and deep-seated ultramafic hydrated peridotite mantle wedge reaching depths of 120 km [1-3]. Chlorite commonly contains up to 13 weight percent H2O, contributing therefore in the volatile cycling and mass transport in subducting lithosphere. Thus, the accurate crystallochemical characterization of chlorites while they are still intact in the original mineral assemblages, like in thin sections prepared for polarization microscopy, will provide a better insight into how these layered silicates formed and changed over time. Furthermore, the determination of the crystallochemical composition of chlorites can broaden the knowledge in fields where sampling is either too complicated, e.g. extraterrestrial missions on Mars, or entirely prohibitive, for instance in cultural heritage [4]. For the latter, a non-destructive, non-invasive (i.e. preparation-free) and non-destructive (object remains intact during the measurement) analytical approach is needed, to establish quantitative relationships between the crystallochemical composition and the Raman signals of chlorite, similar to the strategies developed for other complex hydrous silicates [5-6]

 

This study focuses on a series of 11 chlorite-group minerals from the collection of the Mineralogical Museum, Hamburg, covering the whole clinochlore – chamosite solid-solution series, which were analyzed by Raman spectroscopy, wavelength-dispersive electron microprobe analysis (WD-EMPA), and Mössbauer spectroscopy. The goals were (i) to build up quantitative correlations between the Raman scattering of both framework (15-1215 cm-1) and OH-bond stretching (3200-3800 cm-1) vibrations with the chemical composition of chlorites, particularly when partitioning of Fe2+ and Fe3+ over the tetrahedral and octahedral sites is known., and (ii) to understand how the Raman spectral pattern depends on chlorite orientation. We demonstrate that tetrahedrally coordinated Si and Al can be quantified from the position of the strongest Raman peak at ~ 675 cm-1 , arising from the TO4-ring mode, whereas the amounts of octahedrally coordinated Mg, Fe2+ and Fe3+ can be quantitatively estimated through the fractional intensities of the the multi-component Raman scattering generated by the OH stretching, with typical peaks at ~ 3678, 3655, 3625, 3587, and 3570 cm-1 assigned to specific local chemical configurations.

 

References

 

[1] M.W. Schmidt and S. Poli, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1998, 163, 361.

[2] G. Manthilake, N. Bolfan-Casanova, D. Novella, M. Mookherjee, D. Andrault, Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1501631

[3] A. Steudel, R. Kleeberg, C. Bender Koch, F. Friedrich, K. Emmerich, Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 132-133, 626.

[4] S. Aspiotis, A. Dietz, Z. Földi, F. Hildebrandt, J. Schlüter, B. Mihailova, J. Raman Spectrosc. 2025, 56, 228.

[5] S. Aspiotis, J. Schlüter, G.J. Redhammer, B. Mihailova, Eur. J. Mineral. 2022, 34, 573.

[6] N. Waeselmann, J. Schlüter, T. Malcherek, G. Della Ventura, R. Oberti, B. Mihailova, J. Raman Spectrosc. 2020, 51, 1530.

How to cite: Aspiotis, S., Redhammer, G. J., Peters, S., and Mihailova, B.: Crystal chemistry of the clinochlore – chamosite solid-solution series quantified by Raman spectroscopy, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-16594, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-16594, 2026.