EGU26-17190, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-17190
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PICO | Wednesday, 06 May, 11:06–11:08 (CEST)
 
PICO spot 4, PICO4.9
Recovering protective forests after a disturbance. Lessons from active and passive restoration approaches in mountain forests.
Emanuele Lingua1, Matteo Varotto1, Flavio Taccaliti1, Evan Barbarick1, Davide Marangon1, Paul Richter1, Tommaso Baggio1, Matteo Garbarino2, Niccolò Anselmetto2, Frédéric Berger3, and Raffaella Marzano2
Emanuele Lingua et al.
  • 1University of Padova, Legnaro (PD), Italy
  • 2University of Torino, Grugliasco (TO), Italy
  • 3INRAE, Grenoble, France

When large and severe disturbances affect mountain forests, their ability to provide fundamental ecosystem services may be impaired for a long time. Indeed, in the Alps, forested slopes exert a crucial protective function and rapidly restoring the forest cover after a stand-replacing event is key to prevent the occurrence and mitigate the impact of subsequent natural hazards. Post-disturbance intervention can make or break forest recovery and should thus be tailored to meet management requirements and ecological needs. Widespread salvage logging removing all deadwood and other biological legacies in harsh environments where natural regeneration relies on facilitation mechanisms is a classical example of human intervention leading to undesired consequences. Quite often, when time is not a constraint, passive restoration can be the best option. Whenever active restoration is deemed necessary, particularly when large areas are affected, several challenges and limitations have to be addressed. Lack of saplings supply from tree nurseries, specialized workers and funding availability can hamper restoration activities.

Some lessons learnt from mountain forests of the Italian Alps will be presented, considering restoration interventions after forest fires, windthrows and bark beetle outbreaks. Taking advantage of biological legacies, assisted regeneration and applied nucleation provided encouraging results, with nature-based solutions proving to be effective in promptly restoring the ecosystem services provided by forests, especially in protective stands.

How to cite: Lingua, E., Varotto, M., Taccaliti, F., Barbarick, E., Marangon, D., Richter, P., Baggio, T., Garbarino, M., Anselmetto, N., Berger, F., and Marzano, R.: Recovering protective forests after a disturbance. Lessons from active and passive restoration approaches in mountain forests., EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-17190, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-17190, 2026.