EGU26-17382, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-17382
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 07 May, 12:00–12:10 (CEST)
 
Room 0.51
Comparative analysis of carbon dioxide, methane, and hydrogen plume migration in aquifers
Amin Misaghi Bonabi1, Ryan Haagenson1, Kees Vuik1, and Hadi Hajibeygi2
Amin Misaghi Bonabi et al.
  • 1Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics & Computer Science, TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands
  • 2Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands

The use of geological reservoirs in support of a sustainable energy system has been explored for decades. Geological carbon storage (GCS), underground gas storage (UGS), and underground hydrogen storage (UHS) are prominent examples of such applications. Among the available geological settings, saline aquifers represent a feasible large-scale option for subsurface storage.

To reliably assess reservoir performance and conduct sensitivity analyses, physics-based simulation toolboxes with accurate thermophysical and petrophysical descriptions (density, viscosity, solubility, relative permeability, etc) are essential, in addition to field and laboratory studies. DARSim (Delft Advanced Reservoir Simulator) is an open-source, MATLAB-based simulator capable of fully compositional flow modeling. Combined with the algebraic dynamic multilevel (ADM), it provides an effective framework for multiscale reservoir simulations.

This work begins with a comparative analysis of CO2, CH4, and H2 flow in brine-saturated porous media to examine how differences in gas properties influence reservoir-scale flow behavior, and trapping mechanisms. The study first reproduces the FluidFlower benchmark, a numerical–experimental study originally developed for CO2, for all three gases. Subsequently, an upscaled version of the benchmark is investigated to evaluate model performance using a multiscale strategy. The adaptive multilevel method (ADM) efficiently captures key subsurface processes, including buoyancy-driven migration and phase partitioning. By dynamically refining regions with strong gas mass fraction gradients and coarsening smoother areas, ADM balances computational efficiency with the accuracy required to represent essential flow and transport behavior in heterogeneous reservoirs.

How to cite: Misaghi Bonabi, A., Haagenson, R., Vuik, K., and Hajibeygi, H.: Comparative analysis of carbon dioxide, methane, and hydrogen plume migration in aquifers, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-17382, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-17382, 2026.