- 1UB-Geomodels Research Institute, Department of Earth and Ocean Dynamics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (carolina.olid@ub.edu)
- 2Department of Ecology, Environment and Geoscience, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- 3Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
Groundwater is increasingly recognised as a significant source of carbon dioxide (CO2) to streams. However, the fate of this terrestrial CO2, whether it is released locally to the atmosphere or transported downstream, remains unclear. This uncertainty stems from the difficulty of quantifying groundwater inflows on a fine spatial and temporal scale. In this study, we examine the fate of groundwater-derived CO2 along a 400 m reach of a boreal headwater stream by combining high-resolution measurements of groundwater CO2 inputs, CO2 evasion, and downstream CO2 export during the ice-free period (April to September). Groundwater CO2 inputs exhibited strong spatial heterogeneity, spanning more than two orders of magnitude across gaining stream segments (median: 13 g C m-2 d-1, interquartile range (IR): 0.00 – 50 g C m-2 d-1). This variability was primarily driven by differences in groundwater inflow rates associated with local catchment characteristics, such as stream slope. Over time, groundwater CO2 inputs varied by more than one order of magnitude, with pronounced peaks in late April (108 g C m-2 d-1, IQR: 58 – 126 g C m-2 d-1) and late July (136 g C m-2 d-1, IQR: 46 – 175 g C m-2 d-1). In contrast, groundwater CO₂ inputs remained consistently low during baseflow conditions in mid-July (10 g C m-2 d-1, IQR: 7.1 – 18 g C m-2 d-1) and late August (16 g C m-2 d-1, IQR: 6.6 – 31 g C m-2 d-1). The seasonal variability in groundwater CO2 inputs was driven by two contrasting mechanisms: a spring peak mainly caused by increased groundwater discharge during snowmelt, despite relatively low CO2 concentrations in the groundwater, and summer and autumn peaks linked to rainfall events and higher CO2 concentrations in the groundwater, likely reflecting increased soil respiration. Throughout the study period, the median value of groundwater CO2 inputs exceeded the median value of CO2 evasion (3.0 g C m-2 d-1, IQR: 1.9 – 3.0 g C m-2 d-1) by a factor of 20 and was of the same order of magnitude as downstream CO2 export (76 g C m-2 d-1, IQR: 46 – 300 g C m-2 d-1). These results demonstrate that a substantial proportion of the CO2 derived from groundwater in headwater streams is not immediately emitted, but instead redistributed along the stream network, where it can contribute to downstream emissions or biogeochemical processing. Our findings highlight the need for integrative assessments of CO2 fluxes, which explicitly account for groundwater inflows, atmospheric emissions, and downstream export, particularly in the context of climate-driven changes to hydrology and terrestrial carbon cycling.
How to cite: Olid, C., Hauptmann, D., Karlsson, J., and Klaus, M.: Export, not evasion: the fate of groundwater-derived CO2 in a boreal stream, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-17625, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-17625, 2026.