EGU26-17744, updated on 19 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-17744
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Friday, 08 May, 10:45–12:30 (CEST), Display time Friday, 08 May, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X5, X5.118
Uncertain climate effects of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen
Øivind Hodnebrog1, Caroline Jouan1, Didier A. Hauglustaine2, Fabien Paulot3, Susanne E. Bauer4, Maureen Beaudor5,6, Michael J. Prather7, Marit Sandstad1, Ragnhild B. Skeie1, and Gunnar Myhre1
Øivind Hodnebrog et al.
  • 1Center for International Climate Research (CICERO), Oslo, Norway (oivind.hodnebrog@cicero.oslo.no)
  • 2Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE), CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 3Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton, NJ, USA
  • 4NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
  • 5High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
  • 6now at: LSCE, France
  • 7Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA

Green ammonia (NH3) is produced based on green hydrogen (H2) and has recently gained wide interest due to its potential to decarbonize ammonia production, and as a carbon-free solution for energy storage and transportation. However, the production and use of ammonia come with other climate and environmental challenges due to its alteration of the Earth’s nitrogen cycle. Before introducing new ammonia technologies on a large scale, it is important to thoroughly understand current atmospheric impacts of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen (Nr), mainly the impacts of ammonia, nitrogen oxides (NOX) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. The present work addresses pre-industrial (1850) to present-day (2019) climate effects of Nr, and has been published in Hodnebrog et al. (2025, Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09337-9).

We use five independent latest-generation atmospheric chemistry models (OsloCTM3, CESM2, GISS ModelE, GFDL-AM4.1 and LMDZ-INCA), and find that the change over the industrial era of nitrate and sulfate aerosol abundances owing to Nr emissions varies greatly across the models. Consequently, the direct aerosol radiative forcing (RF) differs widely by model, even in sign. The positive ozone and negative methane RF due to Nr emissions also vary widely between models. While all five models show a net negative RF (i.e., cooling) due to historical anthropogenic Nr emissions, the net climate effect is the sum of several terms that vary in sign and are associated with substantial uncertainties. Future research is clearly needed, both to better define and narrow the uncertainties on the climate effects given here and to quantify climate effects for processes for which estimates do not yet exist (for example, aerosol-cloud interactions due to Nr emissions).

How to cite: Hodnebrog, Ø., Jouan, C., Hauglustaine, D. A., Paulot, F., Bauer, S. E., Beaudor, M., Prather, M. J., Sandstad, M., Skeie, R. B., and Myhre, G.: Uncertain climate effects of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-17744, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-17744, 2026.