EGU26-18102, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-18102
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 07 May, 14:35–14:45 (CEST)
 
Room 1.34
Magnitude and controls of snow sublimation at a high-elevation Swiss alpine site 
Isabella Anglin1,2, Ryan Teuling2, Marius Floriancic3, Patricia Asemann1,4, Michael Lehning1,4, and Harsh Beria1,3
Isabella Anglin et al.
  • 1WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland (isabella.anglin@slf.ch)
  • 2Hydrology and Environmental Hydraulics (HWM) Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands
  • 3Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 4Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Sion, Switzerland

Snow sublimation remains poorly quantified globally, with published estimates spanning orders of magnitude (≈0.01mm/day to >6mm/day), corresponding to ~ 5-90% of winter snowfall. This large uncertainty limits our ability to accurately quantify water availability to downstream ecosystems, as vapor losses through sublimation reduce meltwater availability. Here, we quantify surface snow sublimation over one full winter season (November 2024 to June 2025) at a high-elevation alpine site (Weissfluhjoch Versuchsfeld, 2455 m a.s.l., Switzerland) using continuous eddy-covariance measurements from an integrated open-path gas analyzer and sonic anemometer (IRGASON). We applied an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model to estimate surface snow sublimation and used TreeExplainer-based Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to quantify the relative importance of different meteorological variables on modeled sublimation.

Over the 2024-25 winter season, cumulative net sublimation was 31±21mm, equivalent to 5.1±3.6% of winter snowfall, with a mean daily rate of 0.15 mm/day, placing our estimates at the lower end of previous compilations. During the accumulation period, sublimation accounted for 48% of cumulative winter sublimation and was primarily driven by vapor pressure deficit. In contrast, 52% of cumulative sublimation occurred when the snowpack was melting. For this period, net incoming radiation emerged as the dominant statistical driver of sublimation. Notably, net radiation is only indirectly represented in current energy-balance formulations of physically-based snow models, revealing potential limitations in existing Monin-Obukhov parameterizations. Our results therefore highlight the importance of continuous eddy-covariance observations throughout winter periods for accurately constraining snow sublimation and highlight potential biases in Earth System Models that do not explicitly represent radiative controls on sublimation.

How to cite: Anglin, I., Teuling, R., Floriancic, M., Asemann, P., Lehning, M., and Beria, H.: Magnitude and controls of snow sublimation at a high-elevation Swiss alpine site , EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-18102, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-18102, 2026.