EGU26-18592, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-18592
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 06 May, 15:15–15:25 (CEST)
 
Room N2
Scalable XAI-based forecasting of landslide surface velocities from environmental forcings
Olivier Béjean-Maillard1,2, Catherine Bertrand1,2, Jean-Philippe Malet3,4,5, Laurent Dubois6, Claire Batailles7, Laurent Lespine7, Olivier Maquaire8, Mathieu Fressard8, and Joshua Ducasse1,2
Olivier Béjean-Maillard et al.
  • 1Laboratoire Chrono-Environnement (LCE), CNRS UMR 6249, Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, Besançon, France
  • 2Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers - Terre Homme Environnement Temps Astronomie (THETA), CNRS UAR 3245, Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, Besançon, France
  • 3Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers - École et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre (EOST), CNRS UAR 830 - Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
  • 4Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg (ITES), CNRS UMR 7063 - Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
  • 5Data-Terra, CNRS UAR 2013, Montpellier, France
  • 6Centre d'Etudes et d'expertise sur les Risques, l'Environnement, la Mobilité et l'Aménagement (CEREMA), Direction Territoriale Centre-Est, Bron, France
  • 7Office National des Forêts / Service de Restauration des Terrains de Montagne (ONF-RTM), Délégation Pyrénées Centrales, Tarbes, France
  • 8Environnement - Sociétés - Modélisation - Géomatique (IDEES), CNRS UMR6266, Université Caen-Normandie, Caen, France

Forecasting the evolution of slow-moving landslides is a challenge because landslide motion is modulated by hydrometeorological forcing (rainfall, snowmelt, groundwater fluctuations) acting across multiple timescales, resulting in complex and strongly non-linear forcing–response relationships. By leveraging long-term multi-parameter monitoring, AI-based models can help characterise and simulate these dynamics. However, two limitations persist. First, many approaches rely on deep-learning architectures (RNNs, GRUs, LSTMs) that successfully reproduce non-linear dynamics, but do not constrain landslide physics and have limited interpretability and transferability. Second, few AI applications address landslides governed by the combined influence of multiple hydrometeorological drivers. Existing applications remain largely site-specific, relying on tailored predictor sets and local calibration. Addressing these limitations requires interpretable modelling frameworks capable of operating across multiple landslide sites including data-scarce settings.

Here, we introduce a scalable and eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) modelling framework using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and based on a set of 248 and physically grounded, non site-specific hydrometeorological predictors computed from net rainfall, effective rainfall, and groundwater level time series. Predictors are designed to represent three complementary aspects of landslide water-related forcing: (i) the hydrological state of the system, (ii) hydrological memory effects, and (iii) short-term hydrological transient processes. To capture multi-timescale hydromechanical dependencies, predictors are computed over multiple time windows ranging from 1 to 90 days. The approach simulates daily landslide velocities, evaluates predictive skill using RMSE and MAE metrics, and provides interpretable and explainable constraints on the predictor influence using features importance ranking and SHAP-based attribution tools.

We evaluate the framework on three slow-moving landslides in France: Séchilienne (fractured miscaschist), Viella (morainic and colluvial deposits), and Villerville (chalk, sand and colluvial deposits ovelying marl substrate) spanning contrasting lithologies, deformation mechanisms and kinematics to demonstrate the scalability of the approach.

The XAI framework accurately reproduces landslide velocity time series across sites and testing periods with small residual errors relative to the amplitude of observed velocity variations (Séchilienne,  0.005-0.015 cm.d-¹ ; Viella, 0.01-0.035 cm.d-¹ ; Villerville, 0.02-0.06 cm.d-¹). The identified predictors per landslide align with contrasting physical processes, including delayed pore-water pressure build-up driven by slow matrix infiltration in impermeable slope material (Villerville) and rapid responses to rainfall in more permeable (Viella) or fractured (Séchilienne) slope materials. Together, these results show that XAI frameworks can recover site-specific landslide behaviour while preserving physical interpretability across diverse settings, and demonstrate one of the first applications of a common model structure and non-site-specific predictor set across multiple distinct landslide case studies.

How to cite: Béjean-Maillard, O., Bertrand, C., Malet, J.-P., Dubois, L., Batailles, C., Lespine, L., Maquaire, O., Fressard, M., and Ducasse, J.: Scalable XAI-based forecasting of landslide surface velocities from environmental forcings, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-18592, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-18592, 2026.