EGU26-19372, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-19372
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Tuesday, 05 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X1, X1.141
Monitoring Seismic Noise for Groundwater Dynamics Using Machine Learning 
Karina Loviknes1, John M. Aiken1,2, Shujuan Mao3, Akhilesh Nair4, Lena M. Tallaksen4, Björn Lund5, and Francois Renard1,6
Karina Loviknes et al.
  • 1Njord Centre, Departments of Physics and Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 2Expert Analytics, Oslo, Norway
  • 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, USA
  • 4Section for Geography and Hydrology, Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 5Swedish National Seismic Network, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 6ISTerre, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IRD, Univ. Gustave Eiffel, Grenoble, France

Climate change has led to more frequent and widespread droughts motivating robust monitoring of groundwater resources. Ambient seismic noise interferometry allows to derive relative seismic velocity changes (Δv/v) over time and space in the subsurface. Δv/v correlates well with groundwater fluctuations. Traditional datasets used to monitor groundwater changes, such as groundwater level data from wells and GRACE satellite gravimetric data, are either spatially sparse or limited in spatial resolution. Seismic velocity changes offer an additional, high-resolution measure of groundwater changes. Here, we aim to enhance groundwater monitoring in central Scandinavia, which experienced severe droughts in 2018 and 2022, and increase understanding on how groundwater levels decrease during droughts and recharge during periods of higher precipitations. One challenge of the ambient seismic noise interferometry method is the assumption of uniform noise sources, which rarely applies to seismic stations in Norway and Sweden. In this study, we test several denoising and spatial inversion robustness methods, including denoising autoencoders, convolutional neural networks, and variational inference. Through the integration of seismic and hydrological data, complex signal enhancement, and probabilistic inversion, we develop a robust method for monitoring groundwater in areas with heterogeneous station spacing and non-uniform noise sources. 

How to cite: Loviknes, K., Aiken, J. M., Mao, S., Nair, A., Tallaksen, L. M., Lund, B., and Renard, F.: Monitoring Seismic Noise for Groundwater Dynamics Using Machine Learning , EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-19372, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-19372, 2026.