EGU26-19460, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-19460
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 08 May, 10:55–11:05 (CEST)
 
Room 0.14
Machine learning eliminates near-surface warm bias in reanalysis  and reveals weaker winter surface cooling over Arctic sea ice
Akil Hossain1, Paul Keil2,3, Harsh Grover2,3, Ian Brooks4, Christopher J. Cox5, Michael R. Gallagher5,6, Mats A. Granskog7, Heather Guy8,9, Stephen R. Hudson7, P. Ola G. Persson5,6, Matthew D. Shupe5,6, Michael Tjernström10, Jutta Vüllers11, Von P. Walden12, and Felix Pithan1,13
Akil Hossain et al.
  • 1Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany (akil.hossain@awi.de)
  • 2Helmholtz Centre Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany
  • 3Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum GmbH (DKRZ), Hamburg, Germany.
  • 4Institute for Climate & Atmospheric Science, School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • 5National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Physical Sciences Laboratory (PSL), Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • 6Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • 7Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway.
  • 8National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Leeds, U.K.
  • 9School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K.
  • 10Department of Meteorology & Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Sweden.
  • 11Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Atmospheric Trace Gases and Remote Sensing (IMKASF), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • 12Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Laboratory for Atmospheric Research, Washington State University, Washington, USA.
  • 13Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

The surface energy budget of the Arctic Ocean governs sea ice growth in winter and melt in summer. Understanding the surface energy budget and 2m temperature and correctly representing them in models is a key condition for understanding and projecting Arctic climate change. Direct observations of surface fluxes are scarce, and widely used reanalysis datasets suffer from systematic biases. Here, we train a neural network with observational data to bias-correct ERA5 reanalysis surface fluxes. We achieve substantial reductions in RMSE for hourly values of net shortwave radiation (~40%), downward longwave radiation (~16%) and the total surface energy budget (~55%) as well as 2m temperature (~34%). Our bias-correction eliminates the wintertime warm bias of about 4K in ERA5, reduces wintertime surface cooling by about 50% and dampens summertime surface heating. This revised surface cooling estimate is consistent with independent satellite-observed sea ice growth rates. In contrast to ERA5 fluxes, our bias-corrected data capture the observed clear and cloudy states of the Arctic winter boundary layer and the associated bimodal distribution of net longwave radiation. The bias-corrected data provide an improved baseline for climate model evaluation, climatological and case studies and forcing to drive stand-alone sea ice and ocean models. 

How to cite: Hossain, A., Keil, P., Grover, H., Brooks, I., Cox, C. J., Gallagher, M. R., Granskog, M. A., Guy, H., Hudson, S. R., Persson, P. O. G., Shupe, M. D., Tjernström, M., Vüllers, J., Walden, V. P., and Pithan, F.: Machine learning eliminates near-surface warm bias in reanalysis  and reveals weaker winter surface cooling over Arctic sea ice, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-19460, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-19460, 2026.