EGU26-19514, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-19514
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 08 May, 10:00–10:10 (CEST)
 
Room M2
Towards accurate quantification of New Zealand’s methane emissions from waste and agriculture
Peter Sperlich1, Christian Stiegler1, Alex Geddes2, Hamish Sutton3, Brendon Smith3, Molly Leitch1, Sally Gray1, Gordon Brailsford1, Rowena Moss1, Beata Bukosa1, Sara Mikaloff-Fletcher1, Amir Pirooz4, Richard Turner1, Jocelyn Turnbull5, Johannes Laubach6, Suzanne Rowe7, Lorna McNaughton8, Olivia Spaans8, Kevan Brian9, and Ellen Wymei10
Peter Sperlich et al.
  • 1Earth Science New Zealand (formerly NIWA), Wellington, New Zealand (peter.sperlich@niwa.co.nz)
  • 2Earth Science New Zealand (formerly NIWA), Lauder, New Zealand
  • 3Earth Science New Zealand (formerly NIWA), Christchurch, New Zealand
  • 4Earth Science New Zealand (formerly NIWA), Auckland, New Zealand
  • 5Earth Science New Zealand (formerly GNS Science), Lower Hutt, New Zealand
  • 6Bioeconomy Science Institute (formerly Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research), Lincoln, New Zealand
  • 7Bioeconomy Science Institute (formerly AgResearch), Invermay, New Zealand
  • 8Livestock Improvement Corporation (LIC), Hamilton, New Zealand
  • 9WaterCare, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 10Waste Management New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand

Methane emissions from waste and agriculture account for 46.6 % of Aotearoa New Zealand’s (ANZ) gross greenhouse gas emissions in 2023. Despite the significance of methane emissions, the only way to estimate their magnitude is based on emission factor methods, which include large uncertainties.  We present newly developed tools to directly measure methane emissions from wastewater treatment facilities, animal effluent storage systems and herds of dairy cows. We deploy in situ analysers on mobile observation platforms (vehicle and drone) and quantify methane emission fluxes using the tracer gas technique.  The accuracy of this method is estimated in multiple ways: i) a controlled release experiment, ii) through comparison to a mass-balance modelling approach, iii) through comparison to co-located chamber measurements for methane emissions from effluent ponds, iv) through comparison to co-located measurements of animal emissions using the “GreenFeed” technique. The comparisons show excellent agreement, providing much needed assurance of analytical performance to our mobile techniques. Our tools support ANZ’s farmers and waste managers to better understand current emissions, as well as to assess the efficacy of investments into emission mitigation. Additional tests explore new isotope techniques with the goal to quantify methane fluxes from different components within a plant, for example methane derived from digestors versus methane derived from biosolids in wastewater treatment systems, or methane from the open face of a landfill versus emissions from an area that is covered.

How to cite: Sperlich, P., Stiegler, C., Geddes, A., Sutton, H., Smith, B., Leitch, M., Gray, S., Brailsford, G., Moss, R., Bukosa, B., Mikaloff-Fletcher, S., Pirooz, A., Turner, R., Turnbull, J., Laubach, J., Rowe, S., McNaughton, L., Spaans, O., Brian, K., and Wymei, E.: Towards accurate quantification of New Zealand’s methane emissions from waste and agriculture, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-19514, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-19514, 2026.