EGU26-19839, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-19839
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Monday, 04 May, 10:45–12:30 (CEST), Display time Monday, 04 May, 08:30–12:30
 
Hall X1, X1.124
Post-Rewetting Carbon Dynamics of a Temperate Peatland: Eddy Covariance–Based CO2 and CH4 Fluxes from Himmelmoor, Germany
Yuqing Zhao, David Holl, and Lars Kutzbach
Yuqing Zhao et al.
  • University of Hamburg, Institute of Soil Science, Hamburg, Germany

Peatland rewetting has been widely adopted in Germany as a climate-change mitigation strategy by reducing CO2 emissions from peat decomposition. However, rewetted peatlands may simultaneously act as sources of CH4 with varying strength. Quantifying their net greenhouse gas exchange remains challenging due to landscape heterogeneity and continuously changing vegetation, water table, and surface conditions following the rewetting. Therefore, sustained monitoring during and after the rewetting process is necessary.

In this study, we measured the fluxes of CO2 and CH4 at a rewetted peatland, Himmelmoor, in Northern Germany from 2015 to 2018, extending previous work conducted from 2012 to 2014. The site is characterized by heterogeneous terrain resulting from peat extraction and phased rewetting, which has been carried out alongside extraction activities since 2004. The objective is to provide updated greenhouse gas (GHG) estimates to assess how carbon dynamics have evolved in the rewetted section. Eddy covariance (EC) measurements of CO2 and CH4 fluxes were conducted at the center of the former mining area, allowing flux contributions from multiple surface classes, including rewetted area, vegetation strips, and bare soils to be captured within the source area of a single EC tower.

For CO2 fluxes, we apply and compare a wind-direction-based mechanistic source partitioning approach with a footprint-based source partitioning method to estimate flux contributions from multiple surface classes within the EC footprint, including the rewetted area, vegetated peat strips, and bare (non-rewetted) peat surfaces. For CH4 fluxes, a machine-learning framework based on an ensemble of multilayer perceptrons is used for gap filling and flux modeling of different surface classes. The model is driven by meteorological variables, optimally lagged predictors identified via cross-correlation, fuzzy seasonal and diurnal time variables, and class contributions derived from footprint analysis. 

The processed fluxes are compared with previously published EC measurements from 2012 to 2014. Preliminary results based on tower view fluxes (without flux partitioning and gap filling) show that the mean CO2 flux during the summer months (July–September) ranged from −0.68 to −0.71 µmol m-2 s-1 for the year 2016 to 2018. In comparison, the mean summer CO2 flux in 2012 was 0.67 µmol m-2 s-1, indicating a substantial shift from a net CO2 source to a net CO2 sink. In contrast, mean winter (January, November, and December) CO2 fluxes for 2016 and 2017 were 0.70 and 0.66 µmol m-2 s-1, respectively, which are comparable to the 2012 value (0.66 µmol m-2 s-1).  For CH4, the mean summer flux increased from 45 nmol m-2 s-1 in 2015 to 70 nmol m-2 s-1 in 2018, compared to 40 nmol m-2 s-1 in 2012, indicating a substantial increase in CH4 emissions following rewetting during the summer. Overall, the study suggests that rewetting reduced CO2 emissions while increasing CH4 emissions, providing new insights into the long-term impacts of peatland rewetting on climate and into the processing of EC flux data in heterogeneous landscapes. 

How to cite: Zhao, Y., Holl, D., and Kutzbach, L.: Post-Rewetting Carbon Dynamics of a Temperate Peatland: Eddy Covariance–Based CO2 and CH4 Fluxes from Himmelmoor, Germany, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-19839, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-19839, 2026.