EGU26-20099, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20099
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 07 May, 16:35–16:45 (CEST)
 
Room L1
In search of multi-scale plasma instabilities at the heart of substorm onset: implications for the Plasma Observatory mission
Ishbel Carlyle1, Jonathan Rae1, Andy Smith1, Matthew Townson1, Clare Watt1, Robert Michell2, and Marilia Samara2
Ishbel Carlyle et al.
  • 1Northumbria University, Maths, Physics and Engineering, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (ishbel.carlyle@northumbria.ac.uk)
  • 2NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, MD, USA

The physical trigger of substorm onset remains one of the key unresolved problems in magnetospheric physics. Understanding how, when, and why stored energy in Earth’s magnetotail is explosively released is central to space-weather science. To identify the instability responsible for detonation, recent studies have focused on the earliest auroral signatures of onset—small-scale, quasi-periodic structures known as auroral beads. Previous work has linked these beads to plasma instabilities and to magnetotail dynamics through kinetic Alfvén waves.

To further understand the substorm onset mechanism, we use new measurements from a narrow-field, high-cadence auroral imager. By extending the Kalmoni et al. (2018) methodology, we track the temporal evolution and dispersion characteristics of “mini beads”, in effect beads-within-beads. Our analysis shows that all types of beads move in the same eastward direction but that mini beads precede the larger beads by at least one minute. However, in contrast to larger-scale beads, mini beads obey different dispersion relations, suggesting that mini beads arise from a distinct physical process and represent an earlier or new stage of the instability development leading to substorm onset.  This means that we need to understand the near-Earth transition region on multiple scales far earlier than currently thought, challenging all current substorm onset paradigms. 

We discuss the implications of this analysis for determining the role of multi-scale physical processes in substorm onset for multi-spacecraft missions such as Plasma Observatory.

How to cite: Carlyle, I., Rae, J., Smith, A., Townson, M., Watt, C., Michell, R., and Samara, M.: In search of multi-scale plasma instabilities at the heart of substorm onset: implications for the Plasma Observatory mission, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-20099, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20099, 2026.