- 1Cranfield Environment Centre, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom
- 2CMCC Foundation – Centro Euro Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici
- 3Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE), IPSL, CEA/CNRS/UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- 4Earth System Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
- 5School of Geography and the Environment and Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Greenhouse gas emission metrics are widely used for comparing climate impacts of different gases and for guiding mitigation policy. Conventional metrics such as GWP100 perform well for representing the warming effects of long-lived gases which behave like CO₂ but poorly for short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs). Methane (CH4) is the most important SLCP and has been the main focus of alternative metrics. GWP* was developed to more accurately capture impact on global warming, particularly from stable and declining CH4 emissions which are not well served by GWP100. This means that GWP* better connects emissions pathways to long-term temperature targets (Cain et al., 2022). Previous studies optimised GWP* for CH4 for a limited range of scenarios up to 2100. However, future mitigation pathways involve a wider range of gases and transition speeds, overshoot behaviour, and long-term stabilization beyond this period. In addition, highly radiatively efficient fluorinated gases are increasingly important in mitigation strategies yet have not been demonstrated with the GWP* framework. In this study, we systematically test the performance of GWP* across an expanded set of emissions scenarios, including rapid mitigation, delayed action, and prolonged temperature overshoot pathways, and extend the analysis to multi-century time horizons with an optimisation of the flow term of GWP* (Mastropierro et al., 2025). We further develop and evaluate a generalized formulation of GWP* for fluorinated gases with diverse atmospheric lifetimes. The outcomes examine the performance of GWP* under realistic transition pathways and its representation of temperature responses for fluorinated gases. This work supports the development of more physically consistent multi-gas emission metrics for climate targets, carbon budgeting, and policy design, as it is a simple tool to calculate how much global warming is added or avoided by increasing or cutting SLCPs such as F-gases.
Cain, M., Jenkins, S., Allen, M.R., Lynch, J., Frame, D.J., Macey, A.H., Peters, G.P. Methane and the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 380 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0456
Mastropierro, M., Tanaka, K., Melnikova, I. et al. Testing GWP* to quantify non-CO2contributions in the carbon budget framework in overshoot scenarios. npj Clim Atmos Sci 8, 101 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00980-7
How to cite: Cain, M., Patel, V., Mastropierro, M., Tanaka, K., Jenkins, S., and Allen, M.: Applying GWP* to Long-Term Climate Pathways and Fluorinated Gases, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-20117, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20117, 2026.