EGU26-20197, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20197
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 08 May, 09:30–09:40 (CEST)
 
Room M1
Multi-model diagnostics and uncertainties of atmospheric H2 chemical production and loss terms within the HYway project
Jiayu Xu1, Didier Hauglustaine1, Hui Li1, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie2, Yuanhong Zhao3, Bo Zheng4, Shushi Peng5, and Philippe Ciais1
Jiayu Xu et al.
  • 1Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, LSCE-IPSL (CEA-CNRS-UVSQ), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 2Center for International Climate and Environmental Research – Oslo (CICERO), Oslo, Norway
  • 3College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
  • 4Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Ecological Remediation and Carbon Sequestration, Institute of Environment and Ecology, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China
  • 5Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Hydrogen (H2) is expected to be a crucial substitute for fossil fuels in the ongoing energy transition. However, atmospheric H2 is recognized as an indirect greenhouse gas, as it can contribute to global warming through its coupling to the atmospheric oxidative capacity, including interactions with methane, ozone and stratospheric water vapour. Yet, large uncertainties still remain in the atmospheric H2 budget.

Within the framework of the HYway Horizon Europe project, we quantify and diagnose key chemical drivers of uncertainty in simulated H2 by focusing on two components: chemical production linked to formaldehyde (HCHO) and chemical destruction controlled by the hydroxyl radical (OH). HCHO photolysis is a major source of atmospheric H2, accounting for more than half of the global total. We firstly assess the HCHO chemical production, loss, and global burden across multiple HYway models. The global HCHO burden range from 0.69 to 1.03Tg, indicating a wide inter-model difference of 50%. Therefore, we evaluate the simulated HCHO by ground- and satellite-based observations. The contribution of biogenic hydrocarbons emissions to the HCHO budget is discussed. Oxidation by OH is the second-largest sink of atmospheric H2 after soil uptake. However, the modeled OH is typically overestimated by global chemical models. Here, we examine uncertainty in H2 chemical loss by characterizing the range of OH simulated across HYway models, and by comparing simulated OH with observation-constraint OH fields. Finally, we present a free-running H2 simulation (driven by emissions rather than prescribed surface H2 concentrations) and show that the resulting H2 fields are consistent with observations. Overall, this work provides an integrated evaluation of the chemical controls on H2 in global models and a basis for improving H2 projections under future emission scenarios.

How to cite: Xu, J., Hauglustaine, D., Li, H., Skeie, R. B., Zhao, Y., Zheng, B., Peng, S., and Ciais, P.: Multi-model diagnostics and uncertainties of atmospheric H2 chemical production and loss terms within the HYway project, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-20197, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20197, 2026.