EGU26-20597, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20597
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
PICO | Friday, 08 May, 16:47–16:49 (CEST)
 
PICO spot 5, PICO5.13
Nitrogen dynamics and removal within a riparian zone used as a nature-based solution for secondary-treated wastewater
Laura Escarmena1, Núria Roca1, Sílvia Poblador2,1, Stefania Mattana3, Àngela Ribas4,2, Santi Sabaté1,2, Teresa Sauras-Yera1, Jenny Solís-Llerena1, and Francesc Sabater1,2
Laura Escarmena et al.
  • 1University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • 2CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
  • 3DEAB, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaTech (UPC), Castelldefels, Spain
  • 4BABVE, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent discharge is one of the main pressures in Mediterranean non-perennial streams because of their low dilution capacity. The concentration of nutrients present in effluents leads to the aggravation of the quality of those ecosystems. As an alternative discharge approach, a Mediterranean riparian zone has been used as a nature-based solution (NbS) to remove nitrogen from NH4-rich effluents (3 mg/L). The effluent was discharged through an intermittent horizontal subsurface flow across a 250 m2 riparian soil area located in a Mediterranean basin. The system operated during spring and summer of 2021 and 2023. Effluent application periods (wet conditions) alternated with drainage periods (dry conditions) at a 1:1 ratio.

We conducted sampling campaigns under both conditions and compared them with a control zone. We assessed the removal efficiency of NH4 and NO3 and the impact of the discharge on their concentrations in soil and groundwater. We also measured the N2O soil emissions along with the expression (mRNA) of key microbial functional genes related to nitrification (archaeal and bacterial amoA) and denitrification (nirK and nosZ).

We found mean removal efficiencies of 50% for NH4 and 23% for NO3, similar to those reported for other NbS such as constructed wetlands. As expected, NH4 increased in both groundwater and soil, while NO3 decreased, with concentrations varying between wet and dry periods. Effluent application triggered a significant increase in N2O emissions, also showed a spatial pattern across the riparian zone. The hillslope zone -where the NH4 rich effluent was applied- presented the highest emissions mainly linked to nitrification. The near‑stream zone, characterized by higher soil moisture, had the lowest emissions, consistent with conditions favoring denitrification. Gene expression patterns confirmed the coupling between both processes. Under wet conditions, we found significant positive correlations between N2O and archaeal amoA expression, as well as with nitrifiers/denitrifiers ratio, suggesting that N2O production was more strongly influenced by nitrification. Moreover, we found positive correlations between amoA and nirK genes. The negative correlation between N2O and nosZ/nirK ratio, in addition to high nosZ/nirK ratio values, indicated that wetter conditions favored complete denitrification. Nevertheless, resulting emissions were generally one order of magnitude lower than those of other NbS and like those of riparian zones.

Overall, the biogeochemical heterogeneity of riparian soils, combined with flow intermittency and the NH4 load from wastewater, enhanced both nitrification and denitrification. This resulted in an effective system for nitrogen removal.

How to cite: Escarmena, L., Roca, N., Poblador, S., Mattana, S., Ribas, À., Sabaté, S., Sauras-Yera, T., Solís-Llerena, J., and Sabater, F.: Nitrogen dynamics and removal within a riparian zone used as a nature-based solution for secondary-treated wastewater, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-20597, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20597, 2026.