EGU26-20848, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20848
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 06 May, 11:40–11:50 (CEST)
 
Room 2.23
Carbon and water dynamics in contrasting East African drylands: implications for ecosystem function and resilience
Sonja Leitner1, Vincent Odongo1, Thomas Dowling2, Ilona Gluecks3, Marcin Jackowicz-Korczynski4, Janne Rinne5, Martin Wooster6, and Lutz Merbold7
Sonja Leitner et al.
  • 1International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Mazingira Center, Nairobi, Kenya (s.leitner@cgiar.org)
  • 2University of Auckland, School of Environment, Science Centre, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 3International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
  • 4Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • 5Bioeconomy and Environment, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland
  • 6Department of Geography, NERC National Centre for Earth Observation, Kings College London, London, UK
  • 7Integrative Agroecology Group, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Reckenholzstr- 191, 8046 Zurich, Switzerland

Dryland ecosystems play a pivotal role in terrestrial biogeochemical cycles and are highly sensitive to climate variability and land-use change. In this study, we investigate coupled carbon (C) and water flux dynamics in two distinct East African dryland systems—a savanna rangeland supporting mixed livestock and wildlife grazing, and a rainfed cropland under minimal tillage—over 185 days encompassing variable moisture conditions.

Although cumulative C emissions were of similar magnitude in both systems, they exhibited markedly different temporal dynamics. The rangeland displayed highly pulsed C exchange patterns, with rapid shifts from net ecosystem C loss to uptake following rainfall events, underscoring the strong influence of precipitation pulses on dryland carbon cycling. In contrast, the cropland functioned as a net C sink during the peak growing season; however, inclusion of lateral C exports via chickpea harvest revealed an overall C source at the ecosystem scale over the observation period. These findings emphasize the need to account for non-vertical C fluxes when assessing land-use impacts in drylands.

We observed higher carbon use efficiency (CUE) in the cropland, linked to effective allocation of assimilated C to biomass facilitated by agronomic inputs and conservation tillage. Peak-season water use efficiency (WUE) was also elevated in the cropland, reflecting optimized management under sufficient soil moisture; yet when averaged across the full period, rangeland WUE exceeded that of the cropland, likely due to persistent vegetation cover and drought-adapted plant traits that promote conservative water use. Notably, the cropland exhibited a complex interplay between WUE and CUE, wherein gains in productivity were accompanied by increased respiration, illustrating nonlinear responses of dryland systems to management and environmental drivers.

Both ecosystems were co-limited by water and nitrogen, and plant physiological adaptations to dry spells—such as maintenance of photosynthesis under moisture stress—were key to sustaining CUE. Our results contribute to improved process-level understanding of carbon–water interactions, pulse-driven variability, and resilience in dryland biogeochemical cycles. They highlight the importance of integrating temporal variability, lateral fluxes, and land-use intensity into dryland carbon and water budget assessments under global change.

How to cite: Leitner, S., Odongo, V., Dowling, T., Gluecks, I., Jackowicz-Korczynski, M., Rinne, J., Wooster, M., and Merbold, L.: Carbon and water dynamics in contrasting East African drylands: implications for ecosystem function and resilience, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-20848, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20848, 2026.