EGU26-20898, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20898
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 06 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X3, X3.117
Exploratory relationships between selected ground motion parameters and coseismic landslides: A case study of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou MW6.5 earthquake
Chunhao Wu1, Yan Zhang2, Peng Cui3,4, Fabio Romanelli5,6, Antonella Peresan7, Ruilong Wei1,8, and Giuliano Panza2,9,10
Chunhao Wu et al.
  • 1Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Engineering Resilience, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610213, China
  • 2Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China
  • 3Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
  • 4China-Pakistan Joint Research Center on Earth Sciences, CAS-HEC, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
  • 5Department of Mathematics, Informatics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
  • 6Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China
  • 7National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics CRS-OGS, Udine, Italy
  • 8University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 9Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (BUCEA), Beijing, China
  • 10Associate to the National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics – OGS, Italy

Ground motion is widely recognized as a fundamental factor in triggering coseismic landslides; however, in regional-scale analyses, it is still commonly represented by a single scalar indicator (i.e. the Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA), which limits an in-depth understanding of landslide hazards. Considering the 2017 Jiuzhaigou MW 6.5 earthquake and its documented coseismic landslides as a case study, we investigate the relationship between coseismic landslides and the spatial variability of ground motion, as derived by physics- and scenario-based Neo-deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment (NDSHA). A total of 84 peak ground motion metrics, including PGA, PGV, and PGD across different directional components and frequency bands, are computed and systematically correlated with multiple landslide characteristic parameters. The results show that (i) ground motion components in the radial and north–south directions exhibit the strongest correlation with landslide parameters; (ii) low-frequency ground motion metrics are predominantly and positively associated with landslide point density, area density, and total landslide area, whereas high-frequency metrics are more closely linked to landslide mobility; (iii) PGA- and PGD-related parameters generally outperform PGV in terms of correlation strength across all four landslide descriptors; and (iv) incorporating multiple peak ground motion parameters improves coseismic landslide susceptibility prediction by up to 8.4% compared with the commonly used USGS PGA ShakeMap. The obtained results demonstrate that no single ground motion parameter can fully capture the landslides pattern, and different ground motion parameters should be used for different landslide parameters to improve the accuracy and applicability of the regional coseismic landslide assessment.

How to cite: Wu, C., Zhang, Y., Cui, P., Romanelli, F., Peresan, A., Wei, R., and Panza, G.: Exploratory relationships between selected ground motion parameters and coseismic landslides: A case study of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou MW6.5 earthquake, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-20898, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-20898, 2026.