EGU26-2146, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-2146
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 08 May, 08:33–08:43 (CEST)
 
Room D2
Structural and Kinematic Controls on Paraglacial Rock Slope Deformation at Portage Glacier, Alaska
Emilie Lemaire1, Pooya Hamdi1, Anja Dufresne1, Bretwood Higman2, Jane Walden3,4, Andrea Manconi5,6, Mylène Jacquemart3,4, and Florian Amann1,7
Emilie Lemaire et al.
  • 1RWTH Aachen University, Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, Germany
  • 2Ground Truth Alaska, Seldovia, AK, USA
  • 3ETH Zürich, Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 4Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), bâtiment ALPOLE, Sion, Switzerland
  • 5WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland, Davos Dorf, Switzerland
  • 6Climate Change, Extremes and Natural Hazards in Alpine Regions Research Centre CERC
  • 7Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geothermal Systems IEG, Aachen, Germany

As glaciers thin and retreat worldwide, the stability of surrounding rock slopes is increasingly at risk. This study investigates the long-term deformation of two major on-going instabilities, Portage A and Portage B, situated above Portage Glacier in Alaska. By analyzing decades of historical imagery and remote sensing data, we reconstructed the spatial evolution of these slopes, revealing progressive deformation up-glacier over the past sixty years. To further assess the links between glacier change and slope deformation, we combine structural mapping with remote sensing observations and kinematic analyses. Our results identify three distinct kinematic domains and show that progressive deformation is initiated once the glacier surface lowered below a critical elevation. This creates kinematic freedom for the rock mass to move along structural discontinuities. At Portage Glacier, the onset and progression of the instabilities are not governed solely by glacier thinning but reflect a complex, site-specific interaction between structural discontinuities and cumulative weakening from external processes. Glacier retreat and thinning act as one component within a broader “cascade system”, where multiple factors interact. Additionally, preliminary results from our three-dimensional model provide additional insights into the mechanical response of the slopes under changing boundary conditions. These findings highlight the importance of integrating structural, kinematic, and remote sensing data to better understand paraglacial slope dynamics and anticipate future instabilities in rapidly deglaciating mountain regions.

How to cite: Lemaire, E., Hamdi, P., Dufresne, A., Higman, B., Walden, J., Manconi, A., Jacquemart, M., and Amann, F.: Structural and Kinematic Controls on Paraglacial Rock Slope Deformation at Portage Glacier, Alaska, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-2146, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-2146, 2026.