EGU26-21491, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-21491
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X1, X1.59
Post-Processing of ML-Based Weather Prediction for Solar Capacity Factor Forecasting
Jan-Philip Kraayvanger1 and Julian Quinting2
Jan-Philip Kraayvanger and Julian Quinting
  • 1University of Cologne, Institute of Geophysics and Meteorology, Meteorology, Köln, Germany (j.kraayvanger@uni-koeln.de)
  • 2University of Cologne, Institute of Geophysics and Meteorology, Meteorology, Köln, Germany (julian.quinting@uni-koeln.de)

1. Introduction

Reliable and computationally affordable forecasts of renewable energy production values are necessary for effective grid management and energy market integration and thus for a fast and sustainable transition of the power sector. State-of-the-art Machine Learning based weather prediction (MLWP) models are getting cheaper and better continuously nowadays, making them the perfect option to provide the needed weather forecasts. On the other hand, they lack the variables for solar power generation (solar capacity factor or irradiance or at least cloud cover). This study aims to answer the question of whether MLWP is suitable for deriving solar energy values from weather forecasts and at the same time providing a suitable post-processing pipeline.

2. Methodology

A comprehensive ML-based post-processing technique is developed to predict the solar capacity factor using weather data from forecasts or reanalysis datasets. In addition to basic calculation and data processing steps, the methodology consists of a Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) trained on ERA5 and the “C3S operational energy dataset”. From ERA5 only the variables wind, humidity, pressure, and temperature were used in the training, making the model suitable for use with MLWP data. From the energy dataset, the solar capacity factor is used as ground truth.

With this architecture, weather forecasts of MLWP models are used to predict the solar capacity factor for up to 10 days lead time.

3. Current (and Upcoming) Results

Compared to a simple persistence baseline, the CNN consistently yields a lower RMSE, with the error reduction ranging from approximately 51% for a one-day lead time to 11% for a lead time of 10 days. Similar results can be achieved by comparing the model against a climatology baseline.

Future work will include comparing the CNN's performance across different MLWP model forecasts to identify the optimal models for energy sector predictions.

4. Conclusions

This research demonstrates the potential of ML-based post-processing for transforming raw MLWP model model outputs into usable, reliable capacity factor forecasts for the energy sector. The developed post-processing pipeline provides a vital tool for energy trading and grid operators to manage risk, optimize renewable energy resource deployment, and support grid stability.

How to cite: Kraayvanger, J.-P. and Quinting, J.: Post-Processing of ML-Based Weather Prediction for Solar Capacity Factor Forecasting, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-21491, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-21491, 2026.