EGU26-22268, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-22268
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X5, X5.182
Bayesian Optimisation for Antarctic Survey Planning
Kim Bente1, Roman Marchant2, and Fabio Ramos1,3
Kim Bente et al.
  • 1School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • 2Human Technology Institute, The University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • 3NVIDIA, Seattle, USA

Remoteness, harsh environmental conditions, short field seasons, and high operational costs severely constrain the ability to collect observations of the polar cryosphere at scale. These limitations make efficient survey planning an important methodological need: data acquisition strategies must prioritise measurement locations that simultaneously (i) reduce model uncertainty and (ii) maximise scientific utility, for example by tightening constraints on projected ice sheet contributions to sea level rise. We address this need with Bayesian optimisation (BO), a probabilistic machine learning framework for black-box optimisation that uses a Gaussian process surrogate to model the target geospatial field and an acquisition function to formalise the trade-off between uncertainty reduction and scientific utility when proposing subsequent measurement locations. To showcase the approach, we consider a case study on planning airborne geophysical surveys of Antarctic ice thickness and bed topography, for which we introduce a set of novel acquisition functions tailored to Antarctic ice dynamics that translate cryospheric objectives into the BO framework:

  • The FluxUCB (Flux Upper Confidence Bound) acquisition function incorporates satellite-derived ice velocity observations to prioritise sampling uncertain, potentially high-flux regions under the current posterior, since such regions can exert a disproportionate influence on ice discharge.
  • Alternatively, PBBS (Probability of Bed Below Sea level) prioritises locations with a high posterior probability of marine-based grounding, thereby focusing effort on areas most relevant to assessing marine ice sheet instability (MISI).

In simulation, these objectives reduce posterior uncertainty per flight hour more efficiently than baseline strategies and more consistently target scientifically consequential regions. Together, these acquisition functions illustrate how BO can translate scientific priorities into an uncertainty-aware decision framework for data-efficient polar observation campaigns. More broadly, the framework has strong potential to extract greater value from limited polar field resources beyond airborne surveys, from optimising seismic survey design to informing ice core drilling site selection.

How to cite: Bente, K., Marchant, R., and Ramos, F.: Bayesian Optimisation for Antarctic Survey Planning, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-22268, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-22268, 2026.