EGU26-22459, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-22459
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 06 May, 10:48–10:58 (CEST)
 
Room 0.11/12
Plant uptake of soil carbon: an overlooked flux in carbon cycling?
Nele Meyer1, Lea Giese1, Kristiina Karhu2, Heljä-Sisko Helmisaari2, and Franziska B. Bucka1
Nele Meyer et al.
  • 1Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 2Deptartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Plants are an essential part of the terrestrial C cycle, and it is commonly assumed that they acquire C solely from the atmosphere. However, evidence from plant physiology research indicates that plants can also take up dissolved C via their roots. This concept, however, is not commonly acknowledged within the soil science community. If such an uptake mechanism existed, it could significantly impact C cycling studies involving plants. Here, we aimed at quantifying plant C uptake from solution and soil in two pot experiments. In a first experiment, seedlings of Plantago lanceolata and Picea abies were grown in hydroculture enriched with 13C-labelled glucose or L-lysine. After four weeks, 2.0-5.5% of the applied 13C was recovered in the plants, along with a shift in the δ13C signal of the plant tissues from -31‰ up to +78 ‰. Here, our findings suggest a larger uptake of lysine as compared to glucose. In a second experiment, plants were grown for eight weeks in both sandy and silty soil amended with 13C-labelled soil organic carbon (SOC). After harvesting, we found up to 0.74% of the available tracer substance to be recovered in the plant tissues. Our findings show that the pathway of root C uptake from soil exists, but this mechanism has minor relevance in soil, likely due to competition with microbes for available C. However, it indicates the need for adjustments in our understanding of plant-soil interactions with respect to SOC dynamics, especially in experimental setups where 13C is added to soil: A decrease in soil 13C cannot be attributed exclusively to mineralization processes.

How to cite: Meyer, N., Giese, L., Karhu, K., Helmisaari, H.-S., and Bucka, F. B.: Plant uptake of soil carbon: an overlooked flux in carbon cycling?, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-22459, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-22459, 2026.