EGU26-22501, updated on 14 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-22501
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 07 May, 10:45–10:55 (CEST)
 
Room L1
Comparative analysis of Venera 11, 13, and 14 spectrophotometric data: implications for the near-surface particulate layer
Shubham Kulkarni1, Patrick Irwin1, Colin Wilson1,2, and Nikolay Ignatie3
Shubham Kulkarni et al.
  • 1University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • 2European Space Agency, ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands
  • 3Space Research Institute (IKI), Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

The extreme conditions in Venus’s lower atmosphere make robust calibration of in situ observations challenging. Consequently, measurements from past entry probes provided mixed evidence regarding the existence of a near-surface particulate layer (NSPL). Although the Venera 11 (1978) and Venera 13 and 14 (1982) landers performed in situ spectrophotometric observations during descent, the original datasets were later lost. However, a subset has been reconstructed by digitising graphical outputs produced during the missions’ initial data-processing phase [1]. Following careful analysis to identify and mitigate errors and other artefacts, the reconstructed dataset retains the reliable downward-looking spectra acquired by the three landers from ~62 km altitude to the surface.

Previous retrievals from the reconstructed Venera 13 indicated an NSPL centred at ~3.5–5 km, with particulate optical properties consistent with a basaltic composition [2]. Following the methodology of [2], we use NEMESIS, a radiative transfer and retrieval code [3], to perform near-surface retrievals from the reconstructed Venera 11 and Venera 14 datasets. The results from Venera 11, 13, and 14 retrievals are compared with reported detections and non-detections from other instruments on earlier in situ missions, to explore potential formation pathways for the NSPL in light of the combined observational record.

References:

[1] Ignatiev, N. I., Moroz, V. I., Moshkin, B. E., Ekonomov, A. P., Gnedykh, V. I., Grigor’ev, A. V., and Khatuntsev, I. V. Cosmic Research 35(1), 1–14 (1997).

[2] Kulkarni, S. V., Irwin, P. G. J., Wilson, C. F., & Ignatiev, N. I. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 130, e2024JE008728, (2025).

[3] Irwin, P. G., Teanby, N. A., de Kok, R., Fletcher, L. N., Howett, C. J., Tsang, C. C., Wilson, C. F., Calcutt, S. B., Nixon, C. A., and Parrish, P. D. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 109(6), 1136–1150 (2008). 

How to cite: Kulkarni, S., Irwin, P., Wilson, C., and Ignatie, N.: Comparative analysis of Venera 11, 13, and 14 spectrophotometric data: implications for the near-surface particulate layer, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-22501, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-22501, 2026.