- 1Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science, Uppsala, Sweden
- 2Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- 3Paleoclimate Dynamics Group, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
- 4Forest Biometrics Laboratory – Faculty of Forestry, "Ștefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Universității street, no.13, 720229, Suceava, România
- *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract
The 2022 European drought was a record-breaking event in both severity and spatial extent, exposing critical shortcomings in current drought risk management across the continent. Drawing on two companion studies developed within the Drought in the Anthropocene (DitA) network, this contribution presents integrated insights from a Europe-wide survey of 481 water managers and hydroclimatic data, to reflect on the state of drought preparedness and institutional responses.
The first study offers a physical-to-policy overview of the drought, highlighting how intensifying climate hazards and rising water demands are amplifying drought risks. Impacts were widespread, with Mediterranean regions particularly hard-hit, and covering central and Eastern Europe throughout the summer. Many countries still show limited presence of preparedness and largely rely short-term and responsive measures, highlighting rregional disparities in response capacity. Nevertheless, the study also points towards significantly growing awareness and preparedness. The second study focuses on institutional preparedness. It shows that organisations with forecasting systems or drought management plans in place responded significantly earlier and rated their actions as more effective. Furthermore, over one-third of respondents reported updating or introducing management plans following the previous droughts, indicating a general learning trajectory in the aftermath of major events. Both studies end by advocating for a European Drought Directive to enshrine systemic, long-term, and coordinated drought risk management approaches in European governance.
These findings were only made possible thanks to the broad, interdisciplinary, and collaborative nature of the DitA network. Its widespread reach allowed us to connect with practitioners across 30 countries, making it one of the most comprehensive surveys of the management of the 2022 European drought. The interdisciplinary composition of the network also enabled the research to speak directly to high-level policy questions, bridging science and governance. Together, these two studies demonstrate how systemic drought risk emerges from the interplay between biophysical changes and institutional preparedness, and how tackling these challenges requires interdisciplinary approaches. The 2022 drought must not only serve as a warning signal but also as a turning point towards coordinated, systemic, and equitable drought risk governance in Europe.
Riccardo Biella (1, 2); Anastasiya Shyrokaya (1, 2); Monica Ionita (3, 4); Raffaele Vignola (5, 6); Samuel Sutanto (7); Andrijana Todorovic (8); Claudia Teutschbein (1, 2); Daniela Cid-Escobar (9, 10); Maria Carmen Llasat (11, 12); Pedro Alencar (13); Alessia Matanó (14); Elena Ridolfi (15); Benedetta Moccia (15); Ilias Pechlivanidis (16); Anne van Loon (13); Doris E Wendt (17); Elin Stenfors (1, 2); Fabio Russo (15); Jean-Philippe Vidal (18); Lucy Barker (19); Mariana Madruga de Brito (20); Marleen Lam (21); Monika Bláhová (22, 23); Patricia Trambauer (24); Raed Hamed (13); Scott J. McGrane (25, 26); Serena Ceola (27); Sigrid J. Bakke (28); Svitlana Krakovska (29, 30); Viorica Nagavciuc (3, 4); Faranak Tootoonchi (31); Giuliano Di Baldassarre (1, 2); Sandra Hauswirth (32); Shreedhar Maskey (33); Marthe Wens (13); Lena Merete Tallaksen (34) ---------------------------------------------------------- AFFILIATIONS 1 Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science, Uppsala, Sweden 2 Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 3 Paleoclimate Dynamics Group, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 4 Forest Biometrics Laboratory – Faculty of Forestry, "Ștefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Universității street, no.13, 720229, Suceava, România 5 Water System and Global Change, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands 6 Gund Institute for the Environment, Vermont University, USA 7 Earth Systems and Global Change, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands 8 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute for Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering 9 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain 10 Hydrogeology Group (UPC-CSIC), Spain 11 Department of Applied Physics, University of Barcelona, Spain 12 IdRA, Water Research Institut, University of Barcelona, Spain 13 Chair of Ecohydrology, Technical University of Berlin, Germany 14 Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands 15 Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile e Ambientale, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, 00184 Roma, Italy 16 Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden 17 University of Bristol, Bristol, UK 18 INRAE, RiverLy, Villeurbanne, France 19 UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom 20 Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany 21 Water Resources Management (WRM), Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Wageningen, the Netherlands 22 Global Change Research Institute CAS, Brno, Czech Republic 23 Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic 24 Deltares, The Netherlands 25 Department of Economics, Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow 26 Applied Physics Department, Stanford University, CA, USA 27 Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy 28 Norwegian water and energy directorate, Oslo, Norway 29 Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine 30 National Antarctic Scientific Center, Kyiv, Ukraine 31 Department of crop production ecology, Swedish university of agricultural sciences, Uppsala, Sweden 32 Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands 33 IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands 34 Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
How to cite: Biella, R., Shyrokaya, A., and Ionita, M. and the Drought in the Anthropocene (DitA) working group - Panta Rhei/HELPING: Lessons from the 2022 European Drought through an Interdisciplinary Lens: working with the Drought in the Anthropocene (DitA) Network, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-22719, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-22719, 2026.