EGU26-2310, updated on 19 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-2310
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Thursday, 07 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Thursday, 07 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X4, X4.12
Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3: protocol and preliminary results
Alejandro Romero-Prieto1,2,3, Marit Sandstad4, Benjamin M. Sanderson4, Zebedee R. J. Nicholls5,6,7, Norman J. Steinert4, Thomas Gasser5,8, Camilla Mathison3,9, Jarmo Kikstra5, Thomas J. Aubry10,11, Katsumasa Tanaka8,12, Konstantin Weber13, and Chris Smith5,14
Alejandro Romero-Prieto et al.
  • 1School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • 2Priestley Centre for Climate Futures, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • 3Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, United Kingdom
  • 4CICERO Center for International Climate Research, Oslo, Norway
  • 5Energy, Climate and Environment Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria
  • 6Climate Resource, Berlin, Germany
  • 7Climate & Energy College, School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
  • 8Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE), CNRS, CEA, UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 9School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • 10Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • 11Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK
  • 12Earth System Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
  • 13Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 14Department of Water and Climate, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

Reduced-complexity models (RCMs) are a critical tool in climate science. Their computational efficiency enables applications beyond the reach of more complex models, including uncertainty quantification, the integration of multiple lines of evidence via ensemble constraining, and running large scenario sets in the span of a few days. Thanks to these capabilities, RCMs played important roles in previous IPCC assessments, and are poised to play an important role in the upcoming Seventh Assessment Report (AR7). A key example is evaluating the climate response to the thousands of emissions scenarios in the peer-reviewed literature created with integrated assessment models. However, whether/which RCMs are suitable for performing such a task is contingent on their ability to faithfully emulate the behaviour of more complex models and observed climate change.

The Reduced-Complexity Model Intercomparison Project (RCMIP) was established to assess this capability, as well as to better understand inter-RCM differences (Nicholls et al., 2020; Nicholls et al., 2021). Here, we introduce the protocol for the third and latest phase, RCMIP3. This phase focuses on two priorities. First, it provides a common set of observational benchmarks to be optionally used for ensemble constraining prior to submission, with the objective of mitigating discrepancies arising from different calibration methodologies and facilitating a clearer assessment of intrinsic model differences. Second, it requests an expanded set of variables and experiments from modelling teams to enable a more thorough evaluation of the carbon cycle representation in these models – a key gap in previous RCMIP phases. Additionally, RCMIP3 includes many of the experiments in the “Assessment Fast Track" (AFT) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 7 (CMIP7). As a result, RCMIP3 will improve our understanding of future model differences under these experiments, in addition to providing the community with valuable early projections.

The presentation will outline the RCMIP3 protocol and highlight the types of analyses it enables, along with preliminary results. By explicitly comparing RCM outputs with both ESM simulations and observations, RCMIP3 aims to strengthen the linkage across the climate-model hierarchy as well as evaluating and showcasing the suitability of RCMs for climate assessment.

Nicholls, Z., Meinshausen, M., Lewis, J., Corradi, M.R., Dorheim, K., Gasser, T., Gieseke, R., Hope, A.P., Leach, N.J., McBride, L.A., Quilcaille, Y., Rogelj, J., Salawitch, R.J., Samset, B.H., Sandstad, M., Shiklomanov, A., Skeie, R.B., Smith, C.J., Smith, S.J., Su, X., Tsutsui, J., Vega-Westhoff, B. and Woodard, D.L. 2021. Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: Synthesizing Earth System Knowledge for Probabilistic Climate Projections. Earth’s Future. 9(6), https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001900.

Nicholls, Z.R.J., Meinshausen, M., Lewis, J., Gieseke, R., Dommenget, D., Dorheim, K., Fan, C.-S., Fuglestvedt, J.S., Gasser, T., Golüke, U., Goodwin, P., Hartin, C., Hope, A.P., Kriegler, E., Leach, N.J., Marchegiani, D., McBride, L.A., Quilcaille, Y., Rogelj, J., Salawitch, R.J., Samset, B.H., Sandstad, M., Shiklomanov, A.N., Skeie, R.B., Smith, C.J., Smith, S., Tanaka, K., Tsutsui, J. and Xie, Z. 2020. Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response. Geoscientific Model Development. 13(11), pp.5175–5190, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020.

How to cite: Romero-Prieto, A., Sandstad, M., Sanderson, B. M., Nicholls, Z. R. J., Steinert, N. J., Gasser, T., Mathison, C., Kikstra, J., Aubry, T. J., Tanaka, K., Weber, K., and Smith, C.: Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3: protocol and preliminary results, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-2310, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-2310, 2026.