EGU26-2583, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-2583
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 04 May, 17:50–18:00 (CEST)
 
Room B
Using ²²²Rn as a tracer in hydrogeological studies: a critical review of qualitative and quantitative assessments of potential sources of error
Melanie Vital1, Natasha Dimova2, Benjamin Gilfedder3, Valenti Rodellas4, Stephen Sadler5, Sebastian Santoni6,7, Frederic Huneau6,7, Stephanie Musy8,9, Oliver S Schilling8,9, Lucia Ortega1, and Michael Schubert10
Melanie Vital et al.
  • 1Isotope Hydrology Section, Division of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Wagramer Strasse 5, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria
  • 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35406, USA
  • 3Department of Hydrology, Trier University, D-54296 Trier, Germany
  • 4Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
  • 5Durridge, Durridge UK Ltd., Sheffield Technology Park, Sheffield S1 2NS, UK
  • 6Université de Corse Pascal Paoli, Département d'Hydrogéologie, Campus Grimaldi, BP 52, 20250 Corte, France
  • 7CNRS, UMR 6134, SPE, BP 52, 20250 Corte, France
  • 8Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
  • 9Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland
  • 10UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig Germany.

Radon-222 (²²²Rn), a radioactive noble gas produced by the decay of ²²⁶Ra in geological materials, is widely applied as a natural tracer in hydrogeological investigations. Its ubiquitous occurrence in groundwater, conservative behaviour in aqueous systems, and relatively straightforward on-site detection have made it a powerful tool for identifying groundwater flow paths, quantifying groundwater–surface water exchange and estimating water residence times. However, despite its extensive use, radon-based studies often suffer from large uncertainties and inconsistent results, frequently caused by methodological issues. This contribution presents a comprehensive critical review of the main qualitative and quantitative sources of error associated with the application of ²²²Rn as a tracer.

We analyse the fundamental physical processes controlling ²²²Rn production, emanation from the mineral matrix, accumulation in groundwater under secular equilibrium conditions, and partitioning between water and gas phases and link them to practical aspects of field sampling, on-site and laboratory measurements, and data evaluation. Emphasis is given to the performance and limitations of mobile radon detectors commonly used in hydrological studies, for which we assessed how detector sensitivity, response time, air humidity, carrier gas composition, and internal air-loop configuration influence measurement accuracy and precision. We further discuss the influence of water temperature and salinity on the radon water–air partition coefficient and demonstrate how neglecting these parameters can lead to systematic biases in calculated ²²²Rn-in-water concentrations. Determining representative groundwater endmembers is identified as a key challenge with regards to natural spatial and temporal variability in aquifer properties. Finally, we discuss uncertainties arising from the stochastic nature of radioactive decay.

The review identifies critical steps where avoidable errors commonly occur, including sample collection and handling, degassing during pumping and storage, diffusion losses through container materials, and inappropriate selection of water and air volumes during extraction. Practical recommendations are provided for survey design, sampling strategies, measurement protocols, and data processing, to minimise avoidable errors and improve reproducibility.

By systematically addressing the physical, technical, and methodological aspects of ²²²Rn measurements, this review provides a consolidated framework for best practice in radon tracer studies, supporting more robust applications in hydrogeology and increasing confidence in both qualitative interpretations and quantitative flux estimates.

How to cite: Vital, M., Dimova, N., Gilfedder, B., Rodellas, V., Sadler, S., Santoni, S., Huneau, F., Musy, S., Schilling, O. S., Ortega, L., and Schubert, M.: Using ²²²Rn as a tracer in hydrogeological studies: a critical review of qualitative and quantitative assessments of potential sources of error, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-2583, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-2583, 2026.