EGU26-2594, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-2594
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X4, X4.174
Landslides and nearby impact events on Ceres: evidence of triggering through morphological analysis and absolute model dating
Maria Teresa Brunetti1, Marco Emanuele Discenza2, Lisa Molaro3, Mariacarmela Minnillo1, Goro Komatsu4, and Enrico Miccadei5
Maria Teresa Brunetti et al.
  • 1CNR IRPI, Perugia, Italy (mariateresa.brunetti@cnr.it)
  • 2Geoservizi S.r.l., Ripalimosani, Italy
  • 3University of Trento, Trento, Italy
  • 4Università degli Studi G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy
  • 5Università degli Studi G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Chieti Scalo, Italy

Landslides are widespread geomorphic features on solid bodies across the Solar System [1]. On Ceres, a densely cratered dwarf planet, landslides are common [2-5] and affect more than 20% of craters larger than 10 km [4]. However, their triggering mechanisms remain poorly constrained given the absence of active geological processes. Previous studies have proposed two impact-related landslide triggers on Solar System bodies: i) direct strikes on pre-existing slopes [4] and, ii) impact-induced ground shaking [6,7].

Based on criteria including freshness, well-defined margins, optimal illumination and no crater saturation, we selected eight landslides  ̶ out of fifty-seven associated with nearby impact craters  ̶  for detailed morphological analysis. All of the selected landslides occurred on the outer rim of impact craters, and in most cases within the wall of an older, pre-existing crater. Each landslide was mapped using high-resolution LAMO imagery and the 100 m global shape model [8].

Crater size-frequency distributions were measured on both landslide deposits and impact crater ejecta using two approaches: i) including all craters and, ii) considering only primary craters. A Voronoï tessellation was used to filter out secondary impact areas [9], and absolute model ages were computed using the lunar-derived model [10].

The crater counting method revealed that the eight landslides are geologically young, ranging from ~13.5 Ma to ~107 Ma. Notably, these ages are consistent with those of the nearby impact crater ejecta, indicating a temporal overlap between landslides and impact events.

Overall, the analyses revealed a spatial and temporal correlation between the landslides and nearby impacts on Ceres, which provides evidence for the mechanism that triggered the mass movements [12]. The results from Ceres show that this approach is effective in identifying similar relationships between impact events and landslides on other Solar System bodies.

 

References:

[1] Brunetti M. T. and S. Peruccacci (2023) Oxford Res. Encyclop. Planet. Sci.

[2] Schmidt B. E. et al. (2017) Nature Geosci. 10, 338–343

[3] Chilton H. T. et al. (2019) J. Geophys. Res. Planets 124, 1512–1524

[4] Duarte K. D. et al. (2019) J. Geophys. Res. Planets 124, 3329–3343

[5] Parekh, R. et al. (2021) J. Geophys. Res. Planets 126, e2020JE006573

[6] Neuffer D. P. and R. A. Schultz (2006) Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 39, 227–240

[7] Bickel V. T. et al. (2020) Nat. Commun. 11, 2862

[8] Park R. S. et al. (2019) Icarus 319, 812–827

[9] Discenza et al. (2022) Planet. Space Sci. 217, 105503

[10] Hiesinger et al. (2016) Science 353, 6303

[11] Discenza et al. (2025) Commun. Earth & Environ. 6, 1042

How to cite: Brunetti, M. T., Discenza, M. E., Molaro, L., Minnillo, M., Komatsu, G., and Miccadei, E.: Landslides and nearby impact events on Ceres: evidence of triggering through morphological analysis and absolute model dating, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-2594, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-2594, 2026.