EGU26-3361, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3361
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Friday, 08 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Friday, 08 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X4, X4.3
Midlatitude Cyclone Intensity Biases in Machine Learning Weather Prediction Models
Helen Dacre1, Andrew Charlton-Perez1, Simon Driscoll1,2, Suzanne Gray1, Ben Harvey1,3, Natalie Harvey1, Kevin Hodges1,3, Kieran Hunt1,3, and Ambrogio Volonte1,3
Helen Dacre et al.
  • 1University of Reading, Department of Meteorology, Reading, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (h.f.dacre@reading.ac.uk)
  • 2Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, UK.
  • 3National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Reading, UK.

Forecasting the location and intensity of strong winds associated with midlatitude cyclones remains a key challenge due to their substantial societal and environmental impacts. In this study, we conditionally evaluate the ability of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models and machine learning weather prediction (MLWP) models to represent wind structures linked to these cyclones. Using a feature‑based tracking approach applied to a large sample of Northern Hemisphere cyclone events, we compare how different modelling frameworks capture cyclone evolution, including track, intensity, and near‑surface wind characteristics.

Our analysis shows that MLWP models can reproduce broad aspects of cyclone behaviour, such as large‑scale track evolution, with skill comparable to established operational NWP forecasting systems at medium-range lead times. However, we also identify systematic differences in how these models represent cyclone intensity and associated wind extremes. In particular, MLWP models tend to underestimate key high‑impact features, such as minimum pressure and peak near‑surface winds, relative to dynamical NWP forecasts.

These findings highlight both the promise and current limitations of MLWP systems for predicting midlatitude cyclone hazards. Understanding these behaviours provides guidance for future model development and for the use of ML‑based forecasts in operational and risk‑focused applications.

 

How to cite: Dacre, H., Charlton-Perez, A., Driscoll, S., Gray, S., Harvey, B., Harvey, N., Hodges, K., Hunt, K., and Volonte, A.: Midlatitude Cyclone Intensity Biases in Machine Learning Weather Prediction Models, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-3361, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3361, 2026.