EGU26-3419, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3419
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
When Inventories Lag Behind Forests, Updating Is Inevitable
Temitope Olaoluwa Omoniyi1, Allan Sims1, Ronald E. McRoberts2, Mait Lang1, and Mercy Ajayi-Ebenezer3
Temitope Olaoluwa Omoniyi et al.
  • 1Chair of Forest and Land Management and Wood Processing Technologies, Institute of Forestry and Engi-neering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Fr.R. Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006 Tartu, Estonia (temitope.omoniyi@emu.ee)
  • 2University of Minnesota, Department of Forest Resources, 1530 Cleveland Avenue North, Saint Paul, Min-nesota, 55108 USA (mcrob001@umn.edu)
  • 3Chair of Plant Biology and Agriculture, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental, Fr.R. Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006 Tartu, Estonia (mercy.ajayi-ebenezer@emu.ee)

National forest inventory (NFI) data are often collected over a 5-year or 10-year period, meaning some are already outdated by the time the complete results are available. This study assesses changes in growing stock volume (GSV, m³/ha) using hybrid estimation combined with Sentinel-2 metrics. It focuses on constructing a model for estimating gain in GSV using NFI plot data for two points in time (t_1 and t_2) with remotely sensed data for both t_1 and t_2 for a bitemporal approach, and remotely sensed data only for t_2 for a unitemporal approach. A machine-learning approach based on the random forests (RF) algorithm was used to predict GSV change. The original data for t_2 and additional data for a time (t_3) were then used to evaluate the accuracy of the change prediction at the plot level, after which the predicted changes were applied to update the plot-level GSV to predict plot-level GSV at t_3, which was then validated against the observed plot-level GSV at t_3. Changes were assessed with the Mean Average Annual Volume Change (MAAVC) method representing the average annual change in GSV over a given period. The results indicate that at plot level, the bitemporal model produced GSV change estimates with low accuracy R² = 0.26, RMSE = 4.06 m³/ha and MAE = 3.26 m³/ha, while the unitemporal model, achieved R² = 0.40, RMSE = 3.64 m³/ha, and MAE = 2.65 m³/ha when predicting GSV change. Using the estimated change to project into t_3 the MAAVC based on field data yielded an R² = 0.91, RMSE = 45.11 m³/ha, while the RS unitemporal yielded R² = 0.73, RMSE = 83.79 m³/ha, and the bitemporal yielded an R² = 0.72, RMSE = 83.61 m³/ha. Model performance stability were evaluated using a Monte Carlo simulation approach with a novel stopping criterion. A linear mixed effect model showed a significant difference between methods and post-hoc pairwise comparisons were then applied to determine which groups differ significantly. Conclusively, MAAVC and spatiotemporal RS methods provide a robust framework for projecting GSV using NFI and Sentinel-2 data.

How to cite: Omoniyi, T. O., Sims, A., McRoberts, R. E., Lang, M., and Ajayi-Ebenezer, M.: When Inventories Lag Behind Forests, Updating Is Inevitable, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-3419, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3419, 2026.

OSPP voting tool

This contribution takes part in the OSPP contest. Please log in to see the relevant judging section.