EGU26-3712, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3712
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Friday, 08 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Friday, 08 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X3, X3.59
The Development-Risk Paradox in Watershed Urbanism: Structural Barriers to Nature-Based Resilience in Rural Taiwan
Chi-Tung Hung1, Chia-Han Li2, and Dong-Sin Shih3
Chi-Tung Hung et al.
  • 1Ming Chuan University, School of Design, Dept. of Urban Design and Sustainable Development, Taoyuan City, Taiwan (ct@mail.mcu.edu.tw)
  • 2Ming Chuan University, School of Design, Dept. of Urban Design and Sustainable Development, Taoyuan City, Taiwan (cold11259@gmail.com)
  • 3National Chiao Tung University, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan (dsshih@nycu.edu.tw)

Climate change is intensifying risks across interconnected ecological and social systems, yet in many Asian watershed towns, urbanization patterns continue to contradict resilience principles. This study examines the "Development-Risk Paradox"—a phenomenon where intensive development coincides with high environmental hazards—using Wufeng District in the Wu River watershed (Central Taiwan) as an empirical case of a stressed Socio-Ecological System (SES). By integrating literature review, field surveys, and ArcGIS-based spatial analysis (overlaying IPCC AR6 risk metrics, land use data, and housing prices), we investigated the trade-offs between economic expansion and ecological security.

The results reveal three critical dimensions of vulnerability: (1) Spatial Maladaptation: Densely populated settlements significantly overlap with high-hazard zones (flood, landslide, and fault lines), indicating that urban encroachment is expanding into, rather than retreating from, risk areas. (2) Loss of Nature-Based Buffers: The rapid conversion of agricultural land—which traditionally served as a natural buffer—into impervious residential and industrial surfaces has intensified surface runoff and deteriorated air quality (PM2.5), creating cascading ecosystem disservices. (3) Perverse Economic Incentives: Contrary to risk perception theories, property values in high-risk zones have risen due to industrial-driven speculation. This demonstrates a positive correlation between land use intensity and environmental risk. This study contributes to the session by highlighting a critical governance challenge: the prevailing "growth-first" logic acts as a structural barrier to implementing Nature-based Solutions (NbS). We argue that without addressing these underlying socio-economic drivers and land-market dynamics, community-led adaptation and ecological restoration efforts will remain marginalized in the face of developmental pressure.

How to cite: Hung, C.-T., Li, C.-H., and Shih, D.-S.: The Development-Risk Paradox in Watershed Urbanism: Structural Barriers to Nature-Based Resilience in Rural Taiwan, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-3712, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3712, 2026.