EGU26-3742, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3742
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Tuesday, 05 May, 14:33–14:36 (CEST)
 
vPoster spot 4
Poster | Tuesday, 05 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–18:00
 
vPoster Discussion, vP.89
Designing cost-effective storage portfolios in decarbonizing power systems: a deficit stretch approach
Anasuya Gangopadhyay1 and Ashwin K Seshadri2,3
Anasuya Gangopadhyay and Ashwin K Seshadri
  • 1Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy, Climate mitigation, No. 18 & 19, 10th Cross, Mayura Street, Papanna Layout, Nagashettyhalli (RMV II Stage), Bengaluru 560094, India (anasuya.g.research@gmail.com)
  • 2Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, CV Raman Rd, Bangalore – 560012, Karnataka, India
  • 3Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, CV Raman Rd, Bangalore – 560012, Karnataka, India

High wind and solar penetrations would make bulk energy storage increasingly important for electricity system reliability. We introduce a deficit stretch framework that relates the temporal structure of generation shortfalls to optimal storage configurations in a decarbonizing grid and links the intensity, duration, and frequency of deficits to storage needs and cost–reliability trade-offs. Using Karnataka (India) as a case study, we simulate wind–solar–demand scenarios to examine (i) drivers of deficit-stretch emergence, (ii) which wind–solar–storage portfolios align with available storage technologies, and (iii) how these choices map onto Pareto frontiers of cost versus reliability. We cluster deficit stretches to identify characteristic storage durations (across hours to seasons) enabling a direct mapping from variability patterns to feasible technology options. Results indicate that solar share largely controls the deficit stretch duration spectrum. The proposed framework offers an empirical approach leading from analysis of renewables variability to consideration of bulk energy storage portfolios amidst cost–reliability tradeoffs and is extendable to other regions as well.

How to cite: Gangopadhyay, A. and K Seshadri, A.: Designing cost-effective storage portfolios in decarbonizing power systems: a deficit stretch approach, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-3742, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3742, 2026.