EGU26-3845, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3845
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 07 May, 16:20–16:30 (CEST)
 
Room 0.16
On the Crustal Architecture of the Terrestrial Planets
Adrien Broquet1, Julia Maia1, and Mark A. Wieczorek2
Adrien Broquet et al.
  • 1German Aerospace Center (DLR), Department of Planetary Physics, Berlin, Germany (adrien.broquet@dlr.de)
  • 2Université Paris Cité, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS, Paris, France

The crust is the outermost solid layer of a rocky body with a composition that substantially differs from the deeper interior (mantle and core). Due to its lower thermal conductivity, the crust thermally insulates the interior, and thus the thickness of the crust controls the rate at which a planet cools in time (Plesa et al., 2022). The crust preserves a record of a planet’s geologic history, hosting remanent magnetization from interior dynamos (e.g., Langlais et al., 2010), and has been scarred by tectonic (e.g., Andrews-Hanna & Broquet, 2023), impact (e.g., Melosh et al., 2013), volcanic (e.g., Carr & Head, 2010) and erosional processes (e.g., Hynek et al., 2010). For these reasons, understanding the structure and composition of the crust is fundamental for uncovering the diverse geologic pathways of rocky bodies in the solar system.

In this work, we provide a broad overview of our current knowledge of the composition and structure of planetary crusts following Broquet et al. (2025). We summarize the different geophysical approaches to characterize the shape of the crust and propose improvements to existing inversions of observed gravity and topography for crustal thickness from both conceptual and theoretical perspectives. In particular, we discuss how the gravity field resolution, data filtering, crustal density as well as the elastic and dynamic support of topography all affect crustal thickness inversions. Based on these improvements, we propose refined crustal thickness models for Mercury, Venus, Mars, and the Moon.

Andrews-Hanna, J.C., & Broquet, A. (2023). The history of global strain and geodynamics on Mars. Icarus 395. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115476.

Broquet, A., Maia, J., & Wieczorek, M.A. (2025). On the crustal architecture of the terrestrial planets. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 130, e2025JE009139. doi: 10.1029/2025JE009139

Carr, M.H., & Head, J.W. (2010). Geologic history of Mars. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 294. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.06.042.

Hynek, B.M., Beach, M., Hoke, M.R. (2010). Updated global map of Martian valley networks and implications for climate and hydrologic processes. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 115(E9). doi: 10.1029/2009JE003548.

Langlais, B., Lesur, V., Purucker, M. et al. (2010). Crustal Magnetic Fields of Terrestrial Planets. Space Sci. Rev. 152, 223–249. doi: 10.1007/s11214-009-9557-y.

Melosh, H.J., Freed, A.M., Johnson, B.C., et al. (2013). The Origin of Lunar Mascon Basins. Science 340. doi: 10.1126/science.1235768.

Plesa, A.-C., Wieczorek, M.A., Knapmeyer, M., Rivoldini, A., Walterová, M., Breuer, D. (2022). Chapter Four - Interior dynamics and thermal evolution of Mars - a geodynamic perspective. Adv. Geo. 63. 10.1016/bs.agph.2022.07.005.

How to cite: Broquet, A., Maia, J., and Wieczorek, M. A.: On the Crustal Architecture of the Terrestrial Planets, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-3845, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3845, 2026.