EGU26-3995, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3995
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Monday, 04 May, 08:30–08:40 (CEST)
 
Room 1.85/86
Eco-evolutionary optimization in soil organic matter models
Erik Schwarz1,2, Elsa Abs3, Arjun Chakrawal4, Luciana Chavez Rodriguez5, Pierre Quévreux1,2,6, Thomas Reitz7,8, and Stefano Manzoni1,2
Erik Schwarz et al.
  • 1Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, Saint-Aubin, France
  • 4Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
  • 5Soil Biology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
  • 6Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Environnements Continentaux, Université de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7360, Metz, France
  • 7Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences - Crop Research Unit, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle a. d. Saale, Germany
  • 8Department Ecology of Agroecosystems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Halle a. d. Saale, Germany

Turnover of soil organic matter (SOM) by microbes is an important step in the soil carbon cycle. As microbes are living organisms that interact with their environment and one another, microbial communities are not static but can adapt to various conditions through changes in functional traits. Such adaptation of microbial functional traits can affect the fate of soil organic carbon. However, current microbial-explicit models commonly do not represent such eco-evolutionary dynamics, but treat microbes more akin to inanimate engines or chemical compartments. Eco-evolutionary optimization (EEO) approaches aim to abstract from the complexity of different ecological and evolutionary adaptation mechanisms by assuming that for given conditions, the microbial community might be dominated by those organisms with functional traits that would maximize fitness under these conditions. Different fitness proxies have been used in the literature – but a general framework for EEO approaches in SOM modeling is missing. Based on a review of previous studies, we suggest a classification of EEO approaches in SOM models based on the definition of microbial fitness and the time scale of optimization. Results from different EEO approaches differ systematically along the axes of our classification framework – however, they can also yield convergent qualitative patterns that match experimental observations. Taken together, our results show that EEO approaches have great potential for advancing SOM modeling. Yet, challenges remain – calling especially for further comparative studies and empirical validation of different approaches.

How to cite: Schwarz, E., Abs, E., Chakrawal, A., Chavez Rodriguez, L., Quévreux, P., Reitz, T., and Manzoni, S.: Eco-evolutionary optimization in soil organic matter models, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-3995, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3995, 2026.