EGU26-4069, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4069
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Thursday, 07 May, 09:35–09:45 (CEST)
 
Room M1
Multi-model simulations of the evolution of aerosols and water vapor from the Hunga eruption.
Valentina Aquila1, Rei Ueyama2, Adam Bourassa3, Sergey Khaykin4, Alexandre Baron5,6, Landon Rieger7, Alexei Rozanov8, and the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha′apai Volcano Impact Model Observation Comparison (HTHH-MOC) Team*
Valentina Aquila et al.
  • 1American University, Department of Environmental Science, Washington DC, United States of America (aquila@american.edu)
  • 2Earth Science Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
  • 3Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • 4LATMOS - Laboratoire Atmosphère Observations Spatiales, UVSQ, CNRS, Sorbonne University, Guyancourt, France
  • 5Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science (CIRES), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 6NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory (NOAA CSL), Boulder, CO, USA
  • 7Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canada
  • 8Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP), University of Bremen, Germany
  • *A full list of authors appears at the end of the abstract

The eruption of the Hunga volcano on January 15, 2022, was unprecedented in the satellite record because of the ~150 Tg of water injected in the stratosphere, paired to a relatively low (~0.5 Tg) sulfur dioxide injection. The uniqueness  of this eruption provides an opportunity to evaluate chemistry-climate models over a new range of conditions, different from the sulfur rich eruptions on which they have generally been tested. We  describe coordinated Hunga simulations from ten chemistry climate models with prognostic aerosol modules and show how the presence of the volcanic water vapor led to larger particles than would occur in a water-poor eruption. This has the effect of rapidly increasing the stratospheric aerosol optical depth in the first month and accelerating the settling of the volcanic aerosols in the following months. While the models are able to reproduce the observed evolution of the water vapor eruption plume and the distribution of volcanic aerosols. they fail to simulate the aerosol optical depth. Most of the difference between models and observations, and among models themselves, can be traced to the aerosol microphysics, which is highly dependent on the parameterizations made by each model.

Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha′apai Volcano Impact Model Observation Comparison (HTHH-MOC) Team:

Elizabeth Asher, Ewa M. Bednarz , Slimane Bekki, Christoph Brühl, Parker Case, Simon Chabrillat, Margot Clyne, Peter Colarco, David Cugnet, Sandip Dhomse, Lola Falletti, Nicolas Lebas, Cheng-Cheng Liu, Graham Mann, Marion Marchand, Yifeng Peng, Ilaria Quaglia, Samuel Remy, Mark Schoeberl, Takashi Sekiya, Georgiy L. Stenchikov, Simone Tilmes, Shingo Watanabe, Xinyue Wang, Pengfei Yu, Wandi Yu, Jun Zhang, Yunqian Zhu, Zhihong Zhuo

How to cite: Aquila, V., Ueyama, R., Bourassa, A., Khaykin, S., Baron, A., Rieger, L., and Rozanov, A. and the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha′apai Volcano Impact Model Observation Comparison (HTHH-MOC) Team: Multi-model simulations of the evolution of aerosols and water vapor from the Hunga eruption., EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-4069, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4069, 2026.