EGU26-4090, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4090
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Friday, 08 May, 11:15–11:25 (CEST)
 
Room 3.29/30
Peat depth as a control on peatland ecohydrological resilience
Owen Sutton1, Alex Furukawa1, Kyra Simone1, Greg Verkaik1, Paul Moore1, Alexandra Clark1, Rachel Fallas1, Maia Moore1, Emma Sherwood1, Rosanne Broyd1, Brandon Van Huizen2, Paul Morris3, and James Michael Waddington1
Owen Sutton et al.
  • 1McMaster University, School of Earth, Environment & Society, Hamilton, Canada
  • 2University of Waterloo, School of Environment, Resources & Sustainability, Waterloo, Canada
  • 3University of Leeds, School of Geography, Leeds, UK

Shallow peatlands (average peat depth <40 cm) exhibit differences in key structural and hydrophysical characteristics from their deeper counterparts. They generally exhibit higher bulk density, lower organic matter content, lower hydraulic conductivity, greater tree density and height, and lower microtopographic complexity. These differences mediate the strength of ecohydrological feedback mechanisms, generally resulting in weaker mechanisms with a regulatory function (negative feedbacks) and stronger mechanisms that have a destabilizing function (positive feedbacks). Ultimately, these differences in peatland form and function result in systems that have a profound contrast in ecohydrological behaviour, exhibiting more frequent water table fluctuations, longer periods when the water table is both above and below the optimum depth, and shorter periods where the surface soil water tension is in equilibrium with the water table. We hypothesize that this leads to greater decomposition, lower productivity, and thus a smaller net carbon sequestration. As a consequence, these shallow peatlands are disproportionately more vulnerable to disturbances, such as drought and wildfire. This can perpetuate a cycle of vulnerability, which prevents shallow systems from obtaining the depth associated with greater resilience. By studying these vulnerable systems we can learn what environmental conditions herald a regime shift associated with a loss of resilience and a degrading peat carbon stock.

How to cite: Sutton, O., Furukawa, A., Simone, K., Verkaik, G., Moore, P., Clark, A., Fallas, R., Moore, M., Sherwood, E., Broyd, R., Van Huizen, B., Morris, P., and Waddington, J. M.: Peat depth as a control on peatland ecohydrological resilience, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-4090, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4090, 2026.