EGU26-4147, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4147
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Wednesday, 06 May, 16:20–16:40 (CEST)
 
Room L3
The climate mitigation of global forestation: Constrained by land availability and policy
Zhangcai Qin1, Yijie Wang1, Yakun Zhu1, Susan Cook-Patton2, Wenjuan Sun3, Wen Zhang4, Philippe Ciais5, Tingting Li4, Pete Smith6, Wenping Yuan7, Xudong Zhu8, Josep Canadell9, Xiaopeng Deng1, Yifan Xu1, Hao Xu7, and Chao Yue10
Zhangcai Qin et al.
  • 1School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China
  • 2The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA
  • 3Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 4Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 5Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, CEA CNRS UVSQ, Gif-sur- Yvette, France
  • 6Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  • 7Institute of Carbon Neutrality, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
  • 8College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
  • 9Global Carbon Project, CSIRO Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia
  • 10Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China

Large-scale forestation, a profound form of land cover change, is widely proposed for climate mitigation. Its full Earth system impact, however, depends on complex trade-offs between carbon sequestration in biomass and soils and other biogeophysical feedbacks, alongside stringent land availability constraints. This study assesses the global potential and limits of forestation as a land use change strategy by integrating high-resolution simulations of soil organic carbon dynamics with spatially explicit constraints on land availability designed to prevent adverse impacts on surface albedo, water resources, and biodiversity. Our analysis reveals that when forestation is restricted to these ecologically viable lands, its scale and consequent carbon sequestration potential are substantially lower than previous estimates that did not fully account for these Earth system trade-offs. Furthermore, when land use is limited only to areas aligned with existing national policy commitments, the feasible scope for forestation and its associated carbon sink becomes drastically reduced. Realizing significant climate benefits from forestation requires navigating critical land use trade-offs and expanding ambitious, spatially optimized land-use policies, particularly in regions with high potential.

How to cite: Qin, Z., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Cook-Patton, S., Sun, W., Zhang, W., Ciais, P., Li, T., Smith, P., Yuan, W., Zhu, X., Canadell, J., Deng, X., Xu, Y., Xu, H., and Yue, C.: The climate mitigation of global forestation: Constrained by land availability and policy, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-4147, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4147, 2026.