- 1University of Cambridge, Centre for Human-Inspired Artificial Intelligence, United Kingdom of Great Britain – England, Scotland, Wales (jl2608@cam.ac.uk)
- 2Tsinghua University, Department of Earth System Science, China (hxm@tsinghua.edu.cn)
Methane (CH₄) ranks as the second most potent anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG), driving roughly one-third of contemporary global warming. Beyond its direct role in amplifying climate change, this trace gas acts as a key precursor to tropospheric ozone formation, with cascading indirect impacts on human health, agricultural productivity, and ecosystem integrity. Unlike long-lived GHGs such as CO₂, rapid and sustained curtailment of methane emissions offers the potential to decelerate global warming rates within decades, while delivering co-benefits that span public health protection, food security enhancement, and biodiversity conservation. Pinpointing the spatial distribution of methane emission sources is a cornerstone of effective global mitigation strategies and climate governance. Methane emissions exhibit extreme spatial heterogeneity: a small subset of super-emitters disproportionately contribute to global anthropogenic fluxes. The precise identification and geolocation of these hotspots are therefore pivotal to optimizing the cost-efficiency of mitigation interventions. For regulatory bodies and industrial operators alike, robust source characterization enables the rapid detection of anomalous releases, equipment malfunctions, or operational inefficiencies, facilitating timely remediation and the reduction of chronic unintentional emissions. Remote sensing technologies have revolutionized the detection, spatial mapping, and quantification of near-surface methane plumes, providing unprecedented coverage of global emissions. Yet while elevated methane concentrations can be reliably identified from orbital or airborne sensors, linking these atmospheric anomalies to specific ground-based anthropogenic sources remains a major bottleneck. This task typically relies on labor-intensive manual interpretation of large-scale, multi-temporal imagery datasets—a process that is not only slow and costly but also prone to inter-observer subjectivity. In the absence of accurate source localization, bottom-up emission inventories (compiled from activity data and emission factors) and top-down estimates (derived from atmospheric observations) often diverge by 50% or more, undermining the credibility of climate policies and mitigation targets. As such, the translation of remotely sensed methane hotspots into actionable source locations remains an essential yet elusive goal. Advancing source localization from the regional to the facility scale, and ultimately to individual equipment level, represents a transformative leap in methane monitoring—shifting the paradigm from qualitative detection to quantitative source attribution. To address these interconnected challenges, we introduce a novel Multimodal AI framework designed to integrate and interpret heterogeneous remote sensing datasets. Leveraging the power of multimodal AI for advanced image understanding, this framework enables the automated identification of anthropogenic methane emission sources on a global scale. Using this approach, we have constructed a high-resolution, top-down emission source dataset that catalogs the precise geographic coordinates of key methane-emitting sectors. These include open-pit coal mines and their downstream processing facilities, solid waste landfills, wastewater treatment plants, oil and LNG terminals, and oil and gas extraction areas. Beyond resolving critical discrepancies between top-down and bottom-up emission estimates, our innovative Multimodal AI approach serves as a foundational resource for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and the scientific community to devise targeted, evidence-based methane mitigation strategies.
How to cite: Li, J. and Huang, X.: Global Anthropogenic Methane Emission Source Attribution with Multimodal AI, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-4259, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4259, 2026.