EGU26-4336, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4336
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Oral | Tuesday, 05 May, 14:21–14:24 (CEST)
 
vPoster spot A
Poster | Tuesday, 05 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Tuesday, 05 May, 14:00–18:00
 
vPoster Discussion, vP.68
“Environmental implications of natural sources of arsenic and boron in hydrothermal bodies in the second biggest lake of México.”
Betsabe Atalia Sierra Garcia1, Selene Olea2, Isabel Israde Alcántara3, Ruth Esther Villanueva Estrada4, Eric Morales Casique2, Olivia Zamora Martínez6, Javier Tadeo León6, Martha Gabriela Gómez Vasconcelos7, Ramón Avellán Denis8, and Nelly Ramírez Serrato9
Betsabe Atalia Sierra Garcia et al.
  • 1Posgrado en Ciencias de la Tierra, Instituto de Geología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico (ataliasierragarcia@gmail.com)
  • 2Departamento Dinámica Terrestre Superficial, Instituto de Geología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (ericm@geologia.unam.mx)
  • 3Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. (isabelisrade@gmail.com)
  • 4Instituto de Geofísica, Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (ruth@igeofisica.unam.mx)
  • 6Laboratorio Nacional de Geoquímica y Mineralogía (LANGEM), Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (javiertl@geologia.unam.mx)
  • 7SECIHTI-Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Mexico (gabriela.gomez@umich.mx)
  • 8SECIHTI-Instituto de Geofísica Unidad Michoacán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico (davellan@igeofisica.unam.mx)
  • 9Recursos Naturales, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, ZIP 04510, Ciudad de México, México (nellyrmz@igeofisica.unam.mx)

Lake Cuitzeo is the second biggest lake in Mexico. It is placed in a semi-graben
structure, linked to volcanic rocks and fault systems. On the lake shoreline,
hydrothermal bodies emerge. These present arsenic and boron concentrations and
are used in thermal spas. Nevertheless, it is necessary to study the original and
behavior of these hydrothermal bodies, which provides information for the
sustainable management in order to benefit the local users.
The objective of this work is to determine the spatial distribution of the
hydrothermal manifestations, as well as their hydrogeochemical characteristics and
the temperature they reach at depth. The methodology consisted of sampling thermal wells and springs, along with laboratory determination of major ions and
trace elements. Subsequently, hydrogeochemical diagrams, isoline maps, and
geochemical indicators were used to understand their behavior. The results show
that the thermal sites have higher temperatures at depth and are associated with
the presence of faults.
Finally, the information compiled in this study may be useful for defining a safe and
feasible use of the geothermal resource for the communities inhabiting the study
area, whether for energy generation or for direct-use applications.

How to cite: Sierra Garcia, B. A., Olea, S., Israde Alcántara, I., Villanueva Estrada, R. E., Morales Casique, E., Zamora Martínez, O., Tadeo León, J., Gómez Vasconcelos, M. G., Avellán Denis, R., and Ramírez Serrato, N.: “Environmental implications of natural sources of arsenic and boron in hydrothermal bodies in the second biggest lake of México.”, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-4336, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4336, 2026.