EGU26-4604, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4604
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–15:45 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall X4, X4.41
LCOS Methodology for Energy Storage Systems Incorporating Discharge Capacity Maintenance Constraints under Capacity-Based Contracts
Jiseong Choi1 and JongRoul Woo2
Jiseong Choi and JongRoul Woo
  • 1korea University, Graduate School of Energy and Environment, Energy and Environment, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (oily_choi@korea.ac.kr)
  • 2korea University, Graduate School of Energy and Environment, Energy and Environment, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (jrwoo@korea.ac.kr)

Large-scale Energy Storage Systems (ESS) are increasingly recognized as a cornerstone for grid flexibility and the expansion of renewable energy. Consequently, the Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS) has been widely adopted as a key economic indicator across various electricity markets. While conventional LCOS methodologies effectively serve energy-oriented markets, they exhibit significant limitations in capacity-based contractual environments, where specific operational constraints and rigid capacity maintenance requirements are enforced. This study proposes an advanced LCOS estimation framework that explicitly incorporates two critical constraints: the mandatory maintenance of discharge capacity throughout the contract period and the prohibition of mid-term capacity expansion. To meet these requirements, the model integrates a 'preemptive oversizing strategy' at the initial installation phase to compensate for expected degradation. Furthermore, the framework endogenously reflects the dynamic feedback loop between capacity fading and degradation rates; specifically, it accounts for the gradual increase in the effective Depth of Discharge (DoD) required to maintain constant discharge energy as the system ages, which in turn accelerates cycle-life depletion. Comparative analysis using a simplified grid-scale ESS case demonstrates that traditional LCOS approaches systematically overestimate the economic feasibility of ESS under capacity-based contracts by neglecting the coupled effects of oversizing costs and DoD-induced lifespan reduction. This research clarifies that cost metrics must be tailored to the specific market structure and provides a robust methodological expansion to support consistent design, operation, and investment decision-making for ESS in evolving electricity markets.

How to cite: Choi, J. and Woo, J.: LCOS Methodology for Energy Storage Systems Incorporating Discharge Capacity Maintenance Constraints under Capacity-Based Contracts, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-4604, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4604, 2026.