EGU26-4747, updated on 13 Mar 2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4747
EGU General Assembly 2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Poster | Wednesday, 06 May, 16:15–18:00 (CEST), Display time Wednesday, 06 May, 14:00–18:00
 
Hall A, A.2
Field Estimation of Manning’s Roughness and Its Application to CSA Discharge Computation during Flood Events
Lee Ikhan1, Kim Dongsu2, Kim Dohyeon3, Seo Gibeom4, and Yun Jonghyeon5
Lee Ikhan et al.
  • 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin, Republic of Korea (lee2kan@dankook.ac.kr)
  • 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin, Republic of Korea (dongsu-kim@dankook.ac.kr)
  • 3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin, Republic of Korea (ehgus5905@dankook.ac.kr)
  • 4Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin, Republic of Korea (32202118@dankook.ac.kr)
  • 5Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin, Republic of Korea (jhyun@dankook.ac.kr)

River discharge is a key indicator for water resources management and flood forecasting; however, the traditional single stage–discharge rating curve used for its estimation produces systematic errors under unsteady flow conditions due to hysteresis. In this study, field-measured Manning’s roughness coefficients (n) are first estimated at Naju Bridge on the Yeongsan River by combining H-ADCP–measured discharges with water-surface slopes derived from upstream and downstream stage observations, using the continuous slope–area (CSA) framework in inverse form. The resulting 10-min n time series for the 2020 flood events is then segmented by stage to represent cross-sectional controls on roughness. These stage-wise n segments are subsequently applied to the CSA method to compute discharge time series for the 2019 and 2021 flood events, and the estimates are validated against observations. The estimated n exhibits a consistent stage-dependent pattern, including a rapid decrease at low stages, convergence at intermediate stages, an inflection point near the onset of rapid cross-sectional expansion, and an increase at high stages, reaching n ≈ 0.08–0.09 during extreme floods—values higher than those from conventional empirical formulas and design criteria. Using the measured and stage-segmented n, the CSA-based discharge estimates successfully reproduce hysteresis across six flood events, achieving R² ≥ 0.94 and peak error ≤ 3%, although nRMSE exceeds 10% under low-flow conditions. Overall, applying field-derived roughness substantially improves CSA discharge estimation and supports the practical use of roughness monitoring and CSA-based computation in rivers subject to unsteady flow.

How to cite: Ikhan, L., Dongsu, K., Dohyeon, K., Gibeom, S., and Jonghyeon, Y.: Field Estimation of Manning’s Roughness and Its Application to CSA Discharge Computation during Flood Events, EGU General Assembly 2026, Vienna, Austria, 3–8 May 2026, EGU26-4747, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-4747, 2026.